Menu
Our “Grade A” London office is based in the heart of many of the markets in which our clients operate. We provide full-service legal advice and strategic guidance to clients with interests in the UK and across the globe.

Quick search our London office page:

You, London
& Ince, in any case

Additionally, the Ince insurance practice is located in the Lloyd’s building in the heart of the London insurance market. The well-established insurance team serves the insurance industry covering all aspects of insurance, reinsurance, maritime insurance and commercial disputes.

Clients visiting our London offices benefit from our state of the art IT systems and modern meeting and hospitality facilities.

London Office 

Aldgate Tower
2 Leman Street
London
E1 8QN
United Kingdom

Related news & insights

Insights / Lessons from Twitter - post-acquisition, merger or settlement disputes

24-11-2022 /

Drawing on Elon Musk's recent acquisition of Twitter, we explore some of the ways businesses can reduce their risk of post-acquisition, merger or settlement disputes.

Lessons from Twitter - post-acquisition, merger or settlement disputes

News / Autumn Budget Statement 2022 – what does it mean for your finances?

23-11-2022 / Private Wealth

The one thing we all knew before the Chancellor stood up to deliver the autumn budget on Thursday 17 November was that it would be painful – the unknown was precisely how painful.

Autumn Budget Statement 2022 – what does it mean for your finances?

News / Court confirms issuer’s liability under letter of credit

22-11-2022 / Commodities & Trade

Heytex Bramsche GmbH v. Unity Trade Capital Ltd [2022] EWHC 2488 (Ch) The Court has rejected a finance company’s contention that the documents presented under a letter of credit (LC) that it had issued were discrepant, rendering the LC void. Among other things, the issuer had sought to argue that the standard UCP 600 terms that were incorporated into the LC had been modified and overriden by additional terms, such that the documents were discrepant. The Court, however, emphasised that clear notice would have to be given to effectively incorporate such additional terms which were a clear departure from the UCP 600 and which conflicted with the commercial nature of a LC. Here, any notice given was insufficient and the issuer remained liable under the terms of the LC.

Court confirms issuer’s liability under letter of credit

News / Shipping E-brief November 2022

17-11-2022 / Maritime

The Shipping E-Brief is a publication providing you with key information on legal decisions and developments in shipping and related business areas.

Shipping E-brief November 2022

News / Appeals from arbitration: is reform required?

15-11-2022 / Maritime

In September 2022, the UK Law Commission published a consultation paper with provisional recommendations for updating the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act 1996). Amongst other things, the Law Commission considered whether any changes need to be made to: (i) s.67 of the Act 1996, which deals with jurisdictional challenges to arbitral awards; and (ii) s.69 of the Act 1996, which deals with appeals on points of law.

Appeals from arbitration: is reform required?

News / Owners not in breach of charter and entitled to claim demurrage

09-11-2022 / Maritime

CM P-MAX III Limited v. Petroleos Del Norte SA (MT Stena Primorsk) [2022] EWHC 2147 (Comm) This recent laytime and demurrage dispute demonstrates that an owner can legitimately refuse orders where such orders may jeopardise the safety of a vessel.

Owners not in breach of charter and entitled to claim demurrage
Share this page: