Stuart McAlpine Global Head of Marine Projects
Hague orders emissions cut: a brave new world for energy and beyond?
Climate change is a topic of interest for businesses worldwide. While many take proactive steps to show their commitment to the global pursuit of environmental sustainability, we continue to see a rise in legal action brought against both governments and companies worldwide to accelerate efforts to achieving net-zero emissions.
On 26 May 2021, the District Court of the Hague published its precedent-setting decision, ordering Royal Dutch Shell to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 45% by 2030. The proceedings were initiated by environmental groups Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands), ActionAid and others as well as over 17,000 Dutch citizens.
Litigation against fossil fuel companies is not new, but this is the first time that a corporation has been held responsible by a court, and shows that climate change issues cannot be resolved by simply asking a corporation to pay damages. The court found that whilst Royal Dutch Shell was not presently in breach of its reduction obligation (as argued by the Claimants), it may be forced to completely overhaul its operations and corporate strategy, despite prior plans to reduce the carbon intensity of its energy products and continued investment in cleaner fuels.
This latest decision will no doubt come as a blow to Royal Dutch Shell, who earlier this year was held responsible for the damage caused by its foreign subsidiary, Shell Nigeria. To read more on the Shell Nigeria case, please see The Hague court of appeal finds in favour of Nigerian farmers against Shell.
We expect this landmark decision will have implications for businesses and industries worldwide, despite the judgement only applying in the Netherlands. As such, over the next coming weeks, we will be looking at the effect this decision may have on leading industries, with guidance on risk and measures of safeguarding as much as possible.
Related news & insights
Insights / Court of Appeal overturns Unaoil bribery conviction
16-12-2021 / Energy & Infrastructure
On 10 December 2021, the Court of Appeal in R v Akle & Anor  EWCA Crim 1879 concluded that the Serious Fraud Office’s (SFO) failure to disclose vital evidence had unfairly led to Ziad Akle (Akle) being convicted and jailed for bribery.
Insights / Is civil litigation a proper tool to stop climate change?
02-12-2021 / Energy & Infrastructure
The case of Saul Luciano Lliuya vs RWE - an example of a pending climate litigation case in Germany
Insights / Doctrine of merger does not apply where judgment is for declaratory relief only
01-11-2021 / Energy & Infrastructure
Zavarco plc v Tan Sri Syed Mohd Yusof Bin Tun Syed Nasir  EWCA Civ 1217
Insights / Climate Change Litigation Continueth – The Scottish Case: Greenpeace v. BEIS and the OGA (and BP too)
15-10-2021 / Energy & Infrastructure
The Scottish Court of Session has declared that dealing with the global environmental impact of the consumption of oil is a political matter for the UK Government, not a legal issue for the UK Courts in considering the validity of approval to drill new oil wells in a single field.
News / AfCFTA and Energy & Infrastructure
11-10-2021 / Energy & Infrastructure, Maritime
This article is the third in a series of articles looking at the impact of the African Continental Free Trade Area (the “AfCFTA”) on various practice areas and industry sectors that our clients operate in. This article focuses on Energy and Infrastructure and addresses some of the key questions our clients have asked us.
Insights / Supreme Court clarifies lawful act of duress
21-09-2021 / Energy & Infrastructure
In Times Travel (UK) Ltd v Pakistan International Airlines Corporation (Rev 2)  EWCA Civ 828, the Supreme Court confirmed the existence of the doctrine of ‘lawful act duress’ under English law and its limited scope in commercial transactions.