Hague orders emissions cut: a brave new world for energy and beyond?

News / / London

Climate change is a topic of interest for businesses worldwide. While many take proactive steps to show their commitment to the global pursuit of environmental sustainability, we continue to see a rise in legal action brought against both governments and companies worldwide to accelerate efforts to achieving net-zero emissions.

On 26 May 2021, the District Court of the Hague published its precedent-setting decision, ordering Royal Dutch Shell to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 45% by 2030. The proceedings were initiated by environmental groups Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands), ActionAid and others as well as over 17,000 Dutch citizens.

Litigation against fossil fuel companies is not new, but this is the first time that a corporation has been held responsible by a court, and shows that climate change issues cannot be resolved by simply asking a corporation to pay damages. The court found that whilst Royal Dutch Shell was not presently in breach of its reduction obligation (as argued by the Claimants), it may be forced to completely overhaul its operations and corporate strategy, despite prior plans to reduce the carbon intensity of its energy products and continued investment in cleaner fuels.

This latest decision will no doubt come as a blow to Royal Dutch Shell, who earlier this year was held responsible for the damage caused by its foreign subsidiary, Shell Nigeria. To read more on the Shell Nigeria case, please see The Hague court of appeal finds in favour of Nigerian farmers against Shell.

We expect this landmark decision will have implications for businesses and industries worldwide, despite the judgement only applying in the Netherlands. As such, over the next coming weeks, we will be looking at the effect this decision may have on leading industries, with guidance on risk and measures of safeguarding as much as possible.

Stuart McAlpine

Stuart McAlpine Global Head of Marine Projects

Related sectors:

Related news & insights

News / Climate change litigation update: Derivative claim dismissed

06-07-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

McGaughey & Anor v Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 1233 (Ch) On 24 May 2022, the High Court refused a claim brought against the directors of the Universities Superannuation Scheme (the “USS”), the largest private pension scheme in the UK, for inaction around climate change commitments.

Climate change litigation update: Derivative claim dismissed

News / Refund guarantees – avoiding drafting pitfalls

12-05-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

Refund guarantees are often described as the cornerstones to shipbuilding projects and the buyer’s main security. Although they do not strictly form part of the shipbuilding contract, a shipbuilding project is unlikely to go ahead at all without one. It is therefore important to understand the different types of guarantee instruments, and the impact each has in practice on the guarantor’s obligations to pay and the buyer’s entitlement to recovery. A well-drafted guarantee provides certainty to the parties and strikes a balance between their respective entitlements and obligations.

Refund guarantees – avoiding drafting pitfalls

News / You will be estopped if you cross the line

04-04-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

Estoppel is a useful tool in litigation, which is usually used to bind one party to a statement or a promise that it has previously expressed causing another to accept or adopt it for the purpose of their legal relations. The Court’s recent ruling in Geoquip Marine Operations AG v (1) Tower Resources Cameroon SA (2) Tower Resources PLC addresses estoppel by convention and recognises the requirement for the common assumption created between the parties to be clear and unequivocal. In this article, we focus on the specifics of the Court decision.

You will be estopped if you cross the line

News / Court of Appeal overturns second Unaoil bribery conviction

29-03-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

On 24 March 2022, the Court of Appeal overturned the conviction of a second man, Paul Bond, prosecuted by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in relation to alleged wrongdoing by Unaoil. 

Court of Appeal overturns second Unaoil bribery conviction

News / The Court grapples with impact of Covid-19 on European rugby

08-03-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

As we approach the second anniversary of Covid-19 being declared a pandemic by the World Health Organisation on 11 March 2020, a number of judgments are coming out of the English Courts which are providing useful guidance on how the English Courts are treating claims concerning Covid-19, especially in a force majeure context.

The Court grapples with impact of Covid-19 on European rugby

News / Climate change litigation: Courts decide the law, not political policies

02-03-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

R (Finch) v Surrey County Council CA (Civ Div) [2022] EWCA Civ 187 “The task of the court in a claim such as this is only to decide the issues of law. Those issues cannot extend into the realm of political judgment – which is the responsibility of the executive, not the courts …”

Climate change litigation: Courts decide the law, not political policies