Ince Co advises shipping companies to plan for prolonged Qatar disruption

News / / Dubai

Ince Co has advised shipping and transportation companies with cargo interests in Qatar to plan for a period of disruption and uncertainty, following the decision by a number of Qatar's neighbours and other nations to cut diplomatic ties and close borders with the Gulf StatenbspMajor concerns have arisen among shipping interests over the unprecedented decision by the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Egypt to suspend land, air and sea transport links with QatarnbspLimited official information is preventing any certainty over the practical implementation of the severing of the maritime links between Qatar and other ports at this time, reports Ince Co The Port of Fujairah was the first one to issue a notice prohibiting all Qatari flagged or owned vessels, or vessels sailing to or from Qatari ports, from calling at Fujairah, with similar bans put in place by Saudi Arabia and Bahrain DP World has applied the same prohibition to its UAE ports and extended this to cover vessels loading or unloading cargo intended for Qatar Abu Dhabi Ports Company has also issued a similar circular although there were some suggestion that the restrictions would be relaxed nbspOn 11 June 2017, further to individual circulars being issued by various ports in the UAE, the Director General of the Federal Transport Authority (FTA) has issued a notice to all UAE Ports and Ship Agents making clear that in order to implement the decision of the Government of the UAE on severing relations with the State of Qatar, all UAE ports must not Receive any Qatari flagged vessels or Qatari owned vesselsLoad or Discharge any cargo of Qatari originLoad UAE cargo to QatarFollowing the FTA's notice, the Port of Fujairah has amended its initial circular on 12 June 2017 to reflect the FTA's position nbspRania Tadros, Managing Partner, Ince Co Dubai, commentedThe FTA notice differs in substance to notices which have been issued by some of the ports within the UAE during the course of the last week, and it will be interesting to see how the measures are now implemented nbspOf particular relevance is the fact that there is no reference to vessels not being given port clearance if the last port of call or next port of call is Qatar nbspAs Fujairah Port has now updated its circular, this should mean that Vessels which have loaded in Qatar and wish to bunker in Fujairah may be able to do so as long as they are not Qatari flagged or owned nbspIt is also notable that the measures are now being referred to as Qatar sanctionsThe positions of different authorities is evolving and shipping companies do not yet have a complete picture on which to base their contingency planning, but they should all take care to distinguish between official and unofficial news It is also prudent to review contractual arrangements and whether there is a mechanism in place to deal with these disruptions Where practical, they should make provision for dealing with such issues as potential payment problems, cargo restrictions, illegality and sanctionsIt is impossible to confidently predict how the situation will develop, for how long the Qatar ban will remain in place and whether any further restrictions will be implemented At this time, there are no signs that a wider sanctions regime against Qatar is being contemplated by the GCC states, but we recommend that affected parties monitor the situation closely and check for reports from official sources for guidance as to each State's positionSuez Canal accessAs Rania Tadros explains, there has been no suggestion from the Egyptian authorities nbspthat they will extend their actions to include restricting access to the Suez Canal for Qatari vessels and cargo There have been recent suggestions that 2 Qatari owned vessels changed course as they were approaching the Suez CanalnbspThere has been considerable speculation over access to the Suez Canal Although Article 1 of the Convention of Constantinople (1888) provides access to the Canal to all vessels, irrespective of flag, Article 10 permits the Egyptian authorities to take measures for the defence of Egypt and the maintenance of public order Accordingly, it is possible that Egyptian Authorities could use Article 10 as a reason to prevent entry However, blocking Qatari vesselsvessels carrying Qatari cargo would have a significant impact on trade and trading patterns and there is no current indication from the Egyptian Government that it is adopting such a stanceContractual implicationsInce Co has highlighted several important contractual considerations for shipping companies facing disruption from the situation in Qatar According to Rania Tadros nbspThere are a number of contractual issues facing the shipping industry as a result of these developments Charterparty provisions over blockade and safe portberth warranties may be relevant under these circumstances The concept of frustration may also arise if a vessel cannot get close to its nominated port as a result of the measures announced by the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain Given these and other issues, those entering into charterparties that might be affected by the closure of ports to Qatari trade should consider incorporating terms that allocate the associated risksnbspIt is also possible that the wording of existing clauses may be wide enough to embrace the prohibitions put in place by the UAE and others in relation to Qatari vessels A party may also be able to rely on a force majeure event if it is expressly entitled to do so under the contractUncertainty over transhipment and tradeIt is uncertain at this time what the consequences will be for transhipment cargo as a result of the disruption to air, sea and land links, although shipping interests are exploring whether this could present a practical alternative for cargo intended for Qatar, according to Ince Co It is understood that Omani ports have already seen some ships diverted and Singapore is reportedly noting an increase in volume of bunker sales Saudi Arabia has confirmed closure of the land border, across which 40 of food imports into Qatar are brought Of the countries who have severed ties, the UAE and Egypt are importers of Qatari LNG nbspOrganisations seeking further information and advice on the developing situation in Qatar should contact Ince Co

Related sectors:

Related services:

Related news & insights

News / Thélem’s the breaks: recovering English solicitors’ fees in the Scottish Courts

10-08-2022 / Maritime

Kirkwood v. Thélem Assurances [2022] CSOH 53 A recent Outer House Opinion has provided welcome clarity on the recovery of English solicitors’ fees in the Scottish Courts.

Thélem’s the breaks: recovering English solicitors’ fees in the Scottish Courts

News / Court finds extra-contractual counterclaims fell within scope of arbitration agreement

02-08-2022 / Maritime

Sea Master Special Maritime Enterprise & another v. Arab Bank (Switzerland) Ltd (Sea Master) [2022] EWHC 1953 (Comm) This bill of lading dispute raised issues as to whether the Bank financing the purchase of a cargo, and the holder of a switch bill of lading for the cargo, was a party to the arbitration agreement incorporated into the switch bill and, if so, whether certain counterclaims brought by the Owners came within the scope of that arbitration agreement. The Court agreed with the tribunal’s findings that, once the Court had decided that the Bank was a party to the arbitration agreement, then the counterclaims for reasonable remuneration and quantum meruit came within the ambit of the arbitration agreement, being claims “arising out of or in connection” with the bill of lading contract.

Court finds extra-contractual counterclaims fell within scope of arbitration agreement

News / Party offered reasonably satisfactory security following collision obliged to accept it

20-07-2022 / Maritime

MV Pacific Pearl Co Ltd v. Osios David Shipping Inc (Panamax Alexander) [2022] EWCA Civ 798 The Court of Appeal has confirmed that a party to ASG 2, the standard form Collision Jurisdiction Agreement, is obliged to accept reasonable security once it is offered and cannot choose to refuse that security and seek alternative or better security by arresting a ship. In such circumstances, there is no right to an arrest or any justification for it.

Party offered reasonably satisfactory security following collision obliged to accept it

News / Rosita Lau, MH calls for China businesses to opt for Hong Kong arbitration in their contracts

15-07-2022 / Maritime

In an interview published this morning (14 July) in The Hong Kong Maritime Hub, Ince Partner Rosita Lau, MH calls for Chinese businesses to opt for Hong Kong arbitration in their contracts, initiative that requires attention of officials from the highest level.

Rosita Lau, MH calls for China businesses to opt for Hong Kong arbitration in their contracts

News / Court finds Covid-19 restrictions did not constitute force majeure under MOA

13-07-2022 / Maritime

NKD Maritime Limited v. Bart Maritime (No 2) Inc (Shagang Giant) [2022] EWHC 1615 (Comm) The Court has construed a force majeure clause and considered whether Buyers validly terminated a contract for the sale of a vessel on the basis that Covid-19 lockdown restrictions prevented Sellers from transferring title in the Vessel. 

Court finds Covid-19 restrictions did not constitute force majeure under MOA

News / Shipping gets smart

20-06-2022 / Maritime

On 25 November 2021, the UK Law Commission published its Advice to the UK Government on how English law currently applies to smart legal contracts. Subsequently, on 16 March 2022, the Law Commission published its report on electronic trade documents, together with draft legislation that would implement its recommendations to allow for the legal recognition of trade documents such as bills of lading and bills of exchange in electronic form.

Shipping gets smart