Menu
Ince advises Japanese shipowner MOL on Hong Kong’s first offshore LNG terminal

News /

2 July 2019, Singapore - Leading international law firm, Ince, has advised Japanese shipowner, Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL), on the supply of a floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) to the Hong Kong Offshore LNG terminal project (the “Project”).

The Project involves a joint venture between sponsors Castle Peak Power Company Limited and The Hongkong Electric Co., Ltd. MOL will provide the vessel MOL FSRU Challenger, along with operations and maintenance services, to the Project which will service the Black Point and Lamma Island Power Stations. With a storage capacity of 263,000 cubic meters, the MOL FSRU Challenger is the largest FSRU in the world and the Project will ensure a reliable and stable fuel supply for Hong Kong.

Ince advised MOL on the negotiation of the FSRU Time Charter Party and Services Agreement, Hong Kong regulatory issues and complex finance related issues surrounding quiet enjoyment and step-in rights.

The Ince team which comprised of shipping, energy and finance lawyers was led by Devandran Karunakaran, Singapore office Managing Partner, with a team of lawyers from Singapore and Hong Kong.

Dev commented: "We are delighted to have supported one of our key clients, MOL, on this project, a milestone both in terms of the FSRU and Energy sectors. Ince’s role in this project is a testament to our vast experience in, and continued commitment to, the offshore energy sector in general and the FSRU sector in particular. Our cross-border team was able to give real-time advice on shipping, offshore energy, finance and local regulatory issues.”

Simon Hems, Head Energy & Infrastructure and Partner, London commented:   “Our involvement in supporting one of the most significant players in this market leading project, is testament to our global team’s ability to advise on, and deliver, complex, cross-border energy project work efficiently and effectively.  We look forward to standing with MOL in their future endeavours and wish them every success with the Hong Kong Offshore LNG terminal project.”

MOL is one of the world’s biggest shipowners and is a market-leader in various offshore LNG terminal projects worldwide.

Related sectors:

Related news & insights

News / Climate change litigation update: Derivative claim dismissed

06-07-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

McGaughey & Anor v Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 1233 (Ch) On 24 May 2022, the High Court refused a claim brought against the directors of the Universities Superannuation Scheme (the “USS”), the largest private pension scheme in the UK, for inaction around climate change commitments.

Climate change litigation update: Derivative claim dismissed

News / Refund guarantees – avoiding drafting pitfalls

12-05-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

Refund guarantees are often described as the cornerstones to shipbuilding projects and the buyer’s main security. Although they do not strictly form part of the shipbuilding contract, a shipbuilding project is unlikely to go ahead at all without one. It is therefore important to understand the different types of guarantee instruments, and the impact each has in practice on the guarantor’s obligations to pay and the buyer’s entitlement to recovery. A well-drafted guarantee provides certainty to the parties and strikes a balance between their respective entitlements and obligations.

Refund guarantees – avoiding drafting pitfalls

News / You will be estopped if you cross the line

04-04-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

Estoppel is a useful tool in litigation, which is usually used to bind one party to a statement or a promise that it has previously expressed causing another to accept or adopt it for the purpose of their legal relations. The Court’s recent ruling in Geoquip Marine Operations AG v (1) Tower Resources Cameroon SA (2) Tower Resources PLC addresses estoppel by convention and recognises the requirement for the common assumption created between the parties to be clear and unequivocal. In this article, we focus on the specifics of the Court decision.

You will be estopped if you cross the line

News / Court of Appeal overturns second Unaoil bribery conviction

29-03-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

On 24 March 2022, the Court of Appeal overturned the conviction of a second man, Paul Bond, prosecuted by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in relation to alleged wrongdoing by Unaoil. 

Court of Appeal overturns second Unaoil bribery conviction

News / The Court grapples with impact of Covid-19 on European rugby

08-03-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

As we approach the second anniversary of Covid-19 being declared a pandemic by the World Health Organisation on 11 March 2020, a number of judgments are coming out of the English Courts which are providing useful guidance on how the English Courts are treating claims concerning Covid-19, especially in a force majeure context.

The Court grapples with impact of Covid-19 on European rugby

News / Climate change litigation: Courts decide the law, not political policies

02-03-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

R (Finch) v Surrey County Council CA (Civ Div) [2022] EWCA Civ 187 “The task of the court in a claim such as this is only to decide the issues of law. Those issues cannot extend into the realm of political judgment – which is the responsibility of the executive, not the courts …”

Climate change litigation: Courts decide the law, not political policies