Menu
Temporary Relief for Tenants in Singapore during the COVID-19 Pandemic – Part 1

Insights / / Singapore

It is impossible to exaggerate the significance of landlord and tenant law in Singapore. The steady accretion of land to ultimate Government ownership since the passing of the Land Acquisition Act in 1966 has inevitably reduced the amount of land held in fee simple.

More to the point, almost all businesses in Singapore, whoever owns and operates them, rent their business premises. This is most obviously the case in respect of industrial premises rented from the Jurong Town Corporation, but it is equally true of businesses operating in retail areas such as Orchard Road, and offices in the Central Business District. For a variety of reasons, it just makes sense to rent.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating effect on the economy across all sectors, probably nowhere more dramatically than in the retail, entertainment and hospitality sectors. You did not need to be a business guru to understand this at the height of the Circuit Breaker. All you needed to do was go for a walk in or drive through one of Singapore’s traditionally busy shopping or business areas.  Footfall wasn’t simply reduced; for obvious reasons it had effectively vanished completely.

As in many countries, the Singapore Government wasted no time in providing relief for those affected by the pandemic. The COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act 2020 (Act No. 14 of 2020) (the “original Act”), was passed by Parliament in a single day, 7 April, and came into force on various dates in April (apart from Part 4, dealing with the conduct of meetings, which was deemed to come into effect on 27 March.

Please click here to view the rest of the article.

Bill Ricquier

Bill Ricquier Joint Managing Director, Singapore

Related sectors:

Related news & insights

News / Cladding dispute comes to Court: “Everyone else was doing it”

05-08-2022 / Real Estate

Martlet Homes v. Mullaley and Co Ltd [2022] EWHC 1813 The Court has awarded a property owner damages for the defective design and installation of cladding. This is the first time the High Court has dealt with a dispute concerning cladding on a high rise building since the Grenfell Tower disaster.

Cladding dispute comes to Court: “Everyone else was doing it”

News / Are your partnership properties being managed properly?

02-08-2022 / Private Wealth, Real Estate

In a recent High Court case, Procter v Procter and others [2022] EWHC 1202, the dispute related to a periodic tenancy a landlord had with three sibling tenants, where one sibling retired from the partnership.

Are your partnership properties being managed properly?

News / Ince bolsters London property team

18-07-2022 / Real Estate

Ince is pleased to announce the appointment of Tim Foley, David Sutherland, and Sanna Mir to our London-based property team.

Ince bolsters London property team

Insights / Retention in construction contracts: a thing of the past?

02-02-2022 / Real Estate

Lord Aberdare’s Construction (Retentions Abolition) Bill 2021-22 (‘the Bill’) is the latest of a long string of attempts to drive legislative changes surrounding cash retention in the construction industry.

Retention in construction contracts: a thing of the past?

Insights / New requirement for developers and house builders to register with the New Homes Quality Board

13-01-2022 / Real Estate

On 17 December 2021, The New Homes Quality Board (NHQB) published its New Homes Quality Code. The Code aims to improve the quality of new-build homes and strengthen protection for buyers, spanning from initial sales steps to two years following a purchase.

New requirement for developers and house builders to register with the New Homes Quality Board