Chris Kidd Head of Shipbuilding and Offshore Construction, Joint Head of Energy & Infrastructure, Partner
CONVERSIONCON: An industry first
CONVERSIONCON has been drafted with flexibility in mind, so that it can be used and adapted for projects of varying scale and nature.
Although CONVERSIONCON, in part, draws on inspiration from NEWBUILDCON and REPAIRCON, it has been drafted to specifically address the requirements of a conversion project where different issues can arise compared to a newbuilding or repair project.
In particular, CONVERSIONCON includes provisions which address:
Given the wide-ranging nature of conversion projects, CONVERSIONCON also provides a flexible framework (most notably through the use of BIMCO’s box layout in Part I and the proposed annexes) for the parties to tailor the contract to reflect their specific needs. For example, the parties are prompted to:
Although conversion projects have been commonplace across the industry for many years, contracts are often based on bespoke contracts or contracts that were originally designed for other purposes but have subsequently been adapted. It is hoped that CONVERSIONCON will provide parties with a well-balanced basis to negotiate conversion projects going forward and to allow the parties the ability to tailor the contract to their specific needs.
Should you have any queries, or require any advice, in relation to the use of CONVERSIONCON (or, indeed, conversion contracts based on other forms), please contact Chris Kidd or David Choy, or your regular Ince contact.
A copy of CONVERSIONCON can be found on BIMCO’s website at:https://www.bimco.org/Contracts-and-clauses/BIMCO-Contracts/CONVERSIONCON#
20-06-2022 / Maritime
On 25 November 2021, the UK Law Commission published its Advice to the UK Government on how English law currently applies to smart legal contracts. Subsequently, on 16 March 2022, the Law Commission published its report on electronic trade documents, together with draft legislation that would implement its recommendations to allow for the legal recognition of trade documents such as bills of lading and bills of exchange in electronic form.
14-06-2022 / Maritime
Paul Knapfield v. C.A.R.S. Ltd & others [2022] EWHC 1437 (Comm) Disputes under the Carriage of Goods by Road Act 1965, which incorporates the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road 1956 (CMR), do not come up very often. This decision is, therefore, useful in illustrating when and how the CMR applies. In this case, the Court found that the CMR limit of liability applied to the claimant’s claim, with the result that his losses far exceeded the amount he could ultimately recover from the carrier.
10-06-2022 / Maritime
As we move past the vertex of a U-shaped dip in the global shipping sector caused by supply chain restrictions arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, it is worthwhile to look back at the UAE maritime industry’s growth, lessons learned, and development outlook. Although international maritime trade dropped by 4.1 per cent in 2020, the UAE made significant achievements during this period, ranking third globally in the Bunker Supply Index, and fifth globally as a key competitive maritime hub.
06-06-2022 / Insurance, Maritime
Piraeus Bank A.E. v Antares Underwriting Limited and others (The ZouZou) [2022] EWHC 1169 (Comm)
01-06-2022 / Maritime
Ince is growing its Piraeus office with the addition of three shipping litigators, three ship finance experts, and an additional mariner to the admiralty team.
30-05-2022 / Maritime
Wilforce LLC and Awilco LNG AS v. Ratu Shipping Co SA and Sea Queen Shipping Corporation (Wilforce v. Western Moscow) [2022] EWHC 1190 (Admlty) The Admiralty Court has recently handed down judgment in the case of the collision between the LNG carrier Wilforce and the bulk carrier Western Moscow which took place in the Singapore Straits in May 2019. This case is notably the first collision case to come before the Admiralty Court since the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the Ever Smart collision case. It is also the first case in which the Court has had to consider responsibility for a collision in a Precautionary Area.