Airline roster arrangements and collective bargaining

News / / Airline roster arrangements and collective bargaining

Do airline rostering arrangements fall within the scope of statutory collective bargaining? This question was recently considered by the Court of Appeal in British Airline Pilots’ Association v Limited.

Many employers have entered into agreed methods of collective bargaining following voluntary union recognition. A recent case highlights the advantages of reaching clear agreements with unions to allow flexibility on not only how negotiations are conducted but also the scope of the matters to be negotiated.

Employers would plainly prefer not to face the unenviable situation of a third party dictating their negotiating arrangements. In order to do so agreement must be reached to avoid this situation. In addition as a result of recent case law, unions will now have a persuasive argument when negotiating the initial voluntary arrangements or renewing existing arrangements to broaden the matters which the employer should discuss with them.

In 2010 the British Airline Pilots’ Association (BALPA) was granted statutory union recognition by the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) and as a result was entitled to conduct collective bargaining on behalf of Jet2’s pilots in matters relating to pay, hours and holidays.

Jet2 and BALPA could not agree about the method of collective bargaining and therefore the CAC imposed a specified method of collective bargaining on the parties (the Specified Method). This included a prohibition on Jet2 varying  the contractual terms affecting pay, hours or holidays unless it had first discussed the proposals with BALPA.

Jet2 sought to alter the terms of its rostering and crewing Policy (RCP) and as it was a non contractual policy Jet2 did not consider they needed to discuss proposed changes with BALPA.

BALPA were unsuccessful with their initial arguments in the High Court that as the RCP related to arrangements on pilots’ contractual hours any changes to those arrangements should have been subject to collective bargaining arrangements under the CAC’s Specified Method. The High Court approached the matter on the basis that elements of the RCP were not contractual and were not capable of being incorporated into pilots’ employment contracts.

BALPA appealed and the Court of Appeal found that the non-contractual elements of the RCP did fall within the scope of collective bargaining and Jet2 were required to discuss proposed changes with BALPA. Within both the wording of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRCA) and the statutory recognition order made in 2010 there was nothing which restricted proposals to only those matters that, if agreed, were capable of creating individual contractual rights.


It was a key element of the judgment that the Court of Appeal did not consider it appropriate that trade union officials and managers had to determine what matters were potentially capable of incorporation into individual pilot contracts before determining what matters should fall within the scope of negotiations. Common sense was required to consider those matters that were related to pay, hours and holidays and which therefore should be subject to negotiations.

Jet2 are now required to negotiate any changes with BALPA in respect of the following:

>  The frequency with which rosters are  published and the format

>  Minimum number of days off per month

>  Standby and contact arrangements

>  Night duties and rest breaks

>  Holiday booking procedures

The judgment is a prompt to employers to revisit the terms of their arrangements and possibly re-negotiate their bargaining obligations.

Related sectors:

Related services:

Related news & insights

Insights / A flying start for the restructuring plan

06-01-2021 / Aviation & Travel

Alex Rogan looks at the maiden flight of the restructuring plan, highlighting the practical considerations for future cases.

A flying start for the restructuring plan

News / Incisive Law featured on the September issue of Asian Legal Business

18-09-2020 / Aviation & Travel

We are pleased to have been featured in the September issue of the Asian Legal Business Magazine.

Incisive Law featured on the September issue of Asian Legal Business

Insights / Counter-Drone Tech and the Challenges Thereof

27-08-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Drone detection technologies have been a blind spot for most governments across the world, and it gains significance in the current times considering that drones are now being used for commercial purposes.

Counter-Drone Tech and the Challenges Thereof

Insights / Drones – A New Frontier

13-08-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Unmanned Aircraft Systems / Vehicles (UAS UAV - or Drones, as they are commonly known) refer primarily to an unmanned aircraft which is guided by a remote control.

Drones – A New Frontier

News / Fixing of domestic airfares by Indian government: a mode to be replicated by other countries?

04-06-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Setting aside our aspersions on the manner in which domestic air travel was recommenced in India – by way of a tweet by the aviation minister catching the airlines unawares - the government’s decision to “control” the ticket prices, at least in the short term (3 months), is, I feel, a masterstroke.

Fixing of domestic airfares by Indian government: a mode to be replicated by other countries?

News / Update on the impact of the Coronavirus on the Aviation Industry

06-03-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Impact The COVID-19 outbreak has already had a severe impact on the aviation sector. “Air traffic has collapsed on key Asian routes and it is rippling throughout the air transport network globally, even between countries without major outbreaks of COVID-19.”[1] Flybe yesterday announced its collapse, in part it says due to the effect of coronavirus upon bookings. Airlines are experiencing a serious decline in demand: “one carrier has taken a 26% reduction in passenger numbers across its entire operation and a major carrier has reported booking to Italy collapsing to zero with customers demanding refunds. Many carriers are reporting 50% no-shows across several markets, future bookings are softening and carriers are reacting with flight cancellation, crew being given unpaid leave, freezing of pay increases and plans for aircraft to be grounded.”[2]

Update on the impact of the Coronavirus on the Aviation Industry