Menu
Brexit and aviation: Possible solutions for UK carriers

Insights / / Brexit and aviation: Possible solutions for UK carriers

One solution for a UK carrier would be to restructure operations so as to meet the conditions of Regulation 1008. This would involve changes to the location of the airline’s principal place of business from the UK to a place in the EU and changes of its ownership structure to ensure that more than 50% of effective control is held by EU nationals. 

This solution would obviously present major difficulties and expense to such carriers. In this context, it is significant that it has just been announced that easyJet is in the process of applying for another operating licence from a Member State of the EU.

A second solution for UK Carriers: Access to the EU Market via the European Common Aviation Area

The EU has endeavoured to extend the liberalisation of EU aviation services by creating the European Common Aviation Area (“ECAA”) with non-EU “third countries” such as Switzerland, Norway, Morocco, Israel, and certain Balkan states. Under the ECAA, access is obtained to the EU aviation market by bilateral cooperation agreements negotiated with each third country.

An agreement between the UK and the EU27 to achieve access to the EU market via the ECAA would be possible but would be a complex undertaking, especially as the bilateral agreement would necessarily be influenced by the different interests of the 27 EU Member States (in particular their legacy flag carriers). While the ECAA agreements have been made with a number of states, none have as large and as powerful an aviation sector as the UK and they present less of a competitive “threat”. It is not unlikely that certain Member States would seek to achieve a competitive advantage for their domestic carriers by excluding or restricting UK carriers from having full access to the EU aviation market.

A third solution for UK Carriers: Revival of Past UK Bilateral Air Services Agreements with EU Member States?

It has been suggested in some quarters that, after Brexit, past bilateral air services agreements negotiated by the UK with certain EU Member States could be “revived”. It is difficult to see how this could be possible as such agreements must have been de facto terminated but, in any case, Article 15(4) of Regulation 1008 specifically states that: “Any restrictions on the freedom of Community air carriers to operate intraCommunity air services arising from bilateral agreements between Member States are hereby superseded”. Once, therefore, British carriers cease to be Community air carriers they will be reliant on rights to fly granted under new air service agreements both with the EU27 and indeed other third party states with which the EU has already entered into bloc agreements (the EU/US bilateral being the most obvious).

In EU law, external trade agreements fall under the so-called “Union competence” requiring EU Member states to act collectively rather than unilaterally in negotiating international trade agreements. But, in certain cases, external relations competence is shared between the EU and its Member states, a situation addressed by Regulation 847/2004 in the case of air services agreements with third countries. An application of these principles means that individual EU 27 Member states would not be able to negotiate bilateral agreements with the UK but would negotiate air services

agreements as a bloc. A difficult period of negotiations therefore lies ahead for the UK government in the aviation sector.

Gillie Belsham

Gillie Belsham Global Head of Aviation, Joint Head of Energy & Infrastructure, Partner

Related sectors:

Related news & insights

Insights / A flying start for the restructuring plan

06-01-2021 / Aviation & Travel

Alex Rogan looks at the maiden flight of the restructuring plan, highlighting the practical considerations for future cases.

A flying start for the restructuring plan

News / Incisive Law featured on the September issue of Asian Legal Business

18-09-2020 / Aviation & Travel

We are pleased to have been featured in the September issue of the Asian Legal Business Magazine.

Incisive Law featured on the September issue of Asian Legal Business

Insights / Counter-Drone Tech and the Challenges Thereof

27-08-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Drone detection technologies have been a blind spot for most governments across the world, and it gains significance in the current times considering that drones are now being used for commercial purposes.

Counter-Drone Tech and the Challenges Thereof

Insights / Drones – A New Frontier

13-08-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Unmanned Aircraft Systems / Vehicles (UAS UAV - or Drones, as they are commonly known) refer primarily to an unmanned aircraft which is guided by a remote control.

Drones – A New Frontier

News / Fixing of domestic airfares by Indian government: a mode to be replicated by other countries?

04-06-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Setting aside our aspersions on the manner in which domestic air travel was recommenced in India – by way of a tweet by the aviation minister catching the airlines unawares - the government’s decision to “control” the ticket prices, at least in the short term (3 months), is, I feel, a masterstroke.

Fixing of domestic airfares by Indian government: a mode to be replicated by other countries?

News / Update on the impact of the Coronavirus on the Aviation Industry

06-03-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Impact The COVID-19 outbreak has already had a severe impact on the aviation sector. “Air traffic has collapsed on key Asian routes and it is rippling throughout the air transport network globally, even between countries without major outbreaks of COVID-19.”[1] Flybe yesterday announced its collapse, in part it says due to the effect of coronavirus upon bookings. Airlines are experiencing a serious decline in demand: “one carrier has taken a 26% reduction in passenger numbers across its entire operation and a major carrier has reported booking to Italy collapsing to zero with customers demanding refunds. Many carriers are reporting 50% no-shows across several markets, future bookings are softening and carriers are reacting with flight cancellation, crew being given unpaid leave, freezing of pay increases and plans for aircraft to be grounded.”[2]

Update on the impact of the Coronavirus on the Aviation Industry

Quick links

The Legal 500 2021

“Very available and responsive to company developments in real time. Frank, clear advice – not just the ‘easy’ answer.”

The Legal 500 2022

“The solicitors who have handled our employment related issues are of the highest quality in terms of their specialist area of expertise, their professionalism and their approach to us as clients and as people. Special mention has to be made of Laura Livingstone. Laura became a key member of our team and felt more like a colleague than an external adviser – a colleague you could rely upon. Laura’s attention to detail, professionalism and responsiveness was second to none. Laura has come to know and understand us as individuals and this has enabled her to personalise her advice and even sometimes to preempt our future requirements. We have a very special and extremely valuable relationship with her and the firm.”

- The Legal 500

The Legal 500 2022

“Ince are an excellent “fit” with our specific needs. The firm has consistently provided a broad range of personnel-related advice and in our experience that advice has been consistently of the very highest professional standard: it has been timely, comprehensive, accurate and at a cost which is commensurate with the budget of an organisation of our size.”

- The Legal 500

The Legal 500 2022

“The firm has an unusually high degree of insight into the practices and policies required by the Gambling Commission as regards compliance with its own requirements and conditions – particularly Andrew Tait, derived from his previous in-house experience.”

- The Legal 500