Menu
Adoption of the Chinese Civil Law Code: Key Takeaways for the Commodities Industry

Insights / / Adoption of the Chinese Civil Law Code: Key Takeaways for the Commodities Industry

The new Chinese Civil Code (the “Code”) has been passed by the 13th National People’s Congress on 28 May 2020 and is due to come into force on 1 January 2021. The Code has maintained the structure and main concepts of existing PRC laws, but seeks to enhance existing PRC laws by providing further clarification by way of the detailed articles drafted. The Code consists of 1,260 articles and seeks to regulate the various aspects of civil society, including contracts, torts, private property, etc. 

The purpose of this article is to provide a (non-exhaustive) general overview to the key aspects regulated by the Code with a focus on the laws relating to (1) contracts (2) guarantees on debts, and (3) storage contracts for foreign companies carrying on businesses in China. We aim to highlight some key provisions foreign businesses operating in China should pay attention to when conducting their businesses in China under the enhanced civil law regime. 

Please click here to read the full article.

Feel free to get in touch with your usual contact at Ince or any of the authors for more information.

Related sectors:

Related news & insights

News / Court rejects jurisdictional challenge in petroleum dispute

18-02-2022 / Commodities & Trade

Addax Energy S.A. v. Petro Trade Inc. [2022] EWHC 237 (Comm) In a dispute arising out of the supply of petroleum products, the English Court has dismissed a challenge to its jurisdiction, finding that the claimant supplier had a good arguable case that an English jurisdiction clause was incorporated into an alleged oral agreement by way of course of dealing. In doing so, the Court confirmed that the evidence required to establish a course of dealing need not be extensive or consistent to meet the relevant legal test.

Court rejects jurisdictional challenge in petroleum dispute

News / EU Blocking Regulation, US sanctions and contractual termination – when sanctions and business collide

18-02-2022 / Commodities & Trade, Maritime

In a recent ruling, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) was asked to consider the interpretation of Article 5 of EC Regulation No. 2771/96 of 22 November 1996 (commonly referred to as the “Blocking Regulation”) in relation to the termination, by a German telecoms company, of a contract with a bank subject to US sanctions.

EU Blocking Regulation, US sanctions and contractual termination – when sanctions and business collide

Insights / Court upholds validity of Notice of Arbitration in commodities dispute

12-01-2022 / Commodities & Trade

This commodities dispute highlights the importance of drafting a notice of arbitration carefully to ensure that it covers all the disputes that are intended to be referred to arbitration.

Court upholds validity of Notice of Arbitration in commodities dispute

Insights / Tribunal’s findings in commodities dispute result in substantial injustice

04-08-2021 / Commodities & Trade

PBO v. DONPRO & others [2021] EWHC 1951 (Comm)

Tribunal’s findings in commodities dispute result in substantial injustice

Insights / Where’s my crude oil? Court upholds claim for return of monies paid under FOB contract

24-06-2021 / Commodities & Trade

BP Oil International Limited v. (1) Vega Petroleum Limited & (2) Dover Investments Limited [2021] EWHC 1364 (Comm)

Where’s my crude oil? Court upholds claim for return of monies paid under FOB contract

Insights / Court concludes parties had not agreed to arbitrate commodities dispute

01-03-2021 / Commodities & Trade

Black Sea Commodities Ltd v. Lemarc Agromond Pte Ltd [2021] EWHC 287 (Comm)

Court concludes parties had not agreed to arbitrate commodities dispute