Are banks and other lenders persons with significant control under a new transparency regime for English companies?

News /

We recently highlighted that from 6 April 2016 all English companies and limited liability partnerships will be required to keep a register of every person with significant control (PSC) over them, save in the case of several narrow exceptions. 

A question that is being asked with increasing frequency is whether a lender – or other finance parties in an existing or proposed loan structure – might be considered a PSC?

Official guidance on the meaning of “significant influence or control” contains certain “excepted roles” that would not ordinarily need to be included in the register. Obvious examples here include persons that provide advice or direction in a professional capacity, such as lawyers, accountants, and management consultants. A “Lender” is specifically listed as an excepted role. However, it is possible that a person who has a role or relationship of the kind listed as an excepted role with the company may be a PSC if the role or relationship:

a)  Differs in material respects or contains significantly different features from how the role or relationship is generally understood; or

b)  Forms one of several opportunities which that person has to exercise significant influence or control.

In connection with the role of lender, potential areas of concern include:

•  Where a lender has taken or has security over more than 25% of the shares in the company or the voting rights attached to the shares (subject to certain exceptions);

•  Where a lender has taken security over the rights attached to shares in the company so as to permit the lender to appoint or remove a majority of the board (although the lender taking such a right, or such a consequence arising from lender security, would be rare in practice);

•  Loan agreements and other finance documents that include covenants or undertakings that could arguably be described as types of absolute decision rights or veto rights related to the running of the business of the company – for example a covenant containing a straightforward restriction on the borrower’s ability to make capital expenditure or to dispose of assets, or which restricts certain changes to the business of the borrower; and

•  The role as lender exceeds the role as it is generally understood, for example, if a lender has majority voting rights under a loan facility agreement together with a number of other rights (whether or not in its capacity as lender) such as a right to appoint a board observer or a nominal shareholding. 

In all circumstances, the question of whether existing or future loan arrangements give rise to the requirement that the lender be registered as a PSC will need to be determined on a case-by-case basis.

It should also be noted that the actual entity that should be listed on the PSC register will depend on whether the lender is registrable under the relevant legislation or guidance and an analysis of the chain of ownership. Accordingly, the entity will only be registrable on the PSC register if, in addition to meeting the significant influence or control requirement, it keeps its own PSC register or is publically listed in an EEA state (including the UK) or in Israel, Japan, Switzerland or the USA. It is possible that other individuals or entities connected with the lender may also need to be listed on the PSC register.

Gillie Belsham

Gillie Belsham Global Head of Aviation, Joint Head of Energy & Infrastructure, Partner

Related sectors:

Related news & insights

Insights / A flying start for the restructuring plan

06-01-2021 / Aviation & Travel

Alex Rogan looks at the maiden flight of the restructuring plan, highlighting the practical considerations for future cases.

A flying start for the restructuring plan

News / Incisive Law featured on the September issue of Asian Legal Business

18-09-2020 / Aviation & Travel

We are pleased to have been featured in the September issue of the Asian Legal Business Magazine.

Incisive Law featured on the September issue of Asian Legal Business

Insights / Counter-Drone Tech and the Challenges Thereof

27-08-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Drone detection technologies have been a blind spot for most governments across the world, and it gains significance in the current times considering that drones are now being used for commercial purposes.

Counter-Drone Tech and the Challenges Thereof

Insights / Drones – A New Frontier

13-08-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Unmanned Aircraft Systems / Vehicles (UAS UAV - or Drones, as they are commonly known) refer primarily to an unmanned aircraft which is guided by a remote control.

Drones – A New Frontier

News / Fixing of domestic airfares by Indian government: a mode to be replicated by other countries?

04-06-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Setting aside our aspersions on the manner in which domestic air travel was recommenced in India – by way of a tweet by the aviation minister catching the airlines unawares - the government’s decision to “control” the ticket prices, at least in the short term (3 months), is, I feel, a masterstroke.

Fixing of domestic airfares by Indian government: a mode to be replicated by other countries?

News / Update on the impact of the Coronavirus on the Aviation Industry

06-03-2020 / Aviation & Travel

Impact The COVID-19 outbreak has already had a severe impact on the aviation sector. “Air traffic has collapsed on key Asian routes and it is rippling throughout the air transport network globally, even between countries without major outbreaks of COVID-19.”[1] Flybe yesterday announced its collapse, in part it says due to the effect of coronavirus upon bookings. Airlines are experiencing a serious decline in demand: “one carrier has taken a 26% reduction in passenger numbers across its entire operation and a major carrier has reported booking to Italy collapsing to zero with customers demanding refunds. Many carriers are reporting 50% no-shows across several markets, future bookings are softening and carriers are reacting with flight cancellation, crew being given unpaid leave, freezing of pay increases and plans for aircraft to be grounded.”[2]

Update on the impact of the Coronavirus on the Aviation Industry

Quick links

The Legal 500 2021

“Very available and responsive to company developments in real time. Frank, clear advice – not just the ‘easy’ answer.”

The Legal 500 2022

“The solicitors who have handled our employment related issues are of the highest quality in terms of their specialist area of expertise, their professionalism and their approach to us as clients and as people. Special mention has to be made of Laura Livingstone. Laura became a key member of our team and felt more like a colleague than an external adviser – a colleague you could rely upon. Laura’s attention to detail, professionalism and responsiveness was second to none. Laura has come to know and understand us as individuals and this has enabled her to personalise her advice and even sometimes to preempt our future requirements. We have a very special and extremely valuable relationship with her and the firm.”

- The Legal 500

The Legal 500 2022

“Ince are an excellent “fit” with our specific needs. The firm has consistently provided a broad range of personnel-related advice and in our experience that advice has been consistently of the very highest professional standard: it has been timely, comprehensive, accurate and at a cost which is commensurate with the budget of an organisation of our size.”

- The Legal 500

The Legal 500 2022

“The firm has an unusually high degree of insight into the practices and policies required by the Gambling Commission as regards compliance with its own requirements and conditions – particularly Andrew Tait, derived from his previous in-house experience.”

- The Legal 500