
Mona Patel Partner
COVID-19: Allocating M&A deal risk between buyers and sellers in a post-COVID-19 world
The current climate has made the valuation of target companies very difficult for buyers, ultimately impacting M&A deal flow globally. Whilst deal flow is unlikely to resume the pace it took in 2019 it appears that buyers and sellers alike are feeling more comfortable with exploring deals they may not have considered 2 months ago. However the M&A landscape is now very different. These days it is less of a sellers’ market and parties are having to consider more flexible and creative ways to structure a deal to allow for the fair allocation of the valuation and financial risks associated with the transaction.
Aside from pandemic related due diligence checks sellers have come to expect to receive (see our article COVID-19: Transactional due diligence in a post COVID-19 world), particular questions are also being impressed upon the target’s management to allow buyers to better assess the risks, capabilities and operations of the business of the target and consider impact on the value of the business. Questions being asked of management include:
A buyer wants to ascertain the seller's pre-COVID-19 financial performance and how the seller will manage through the disruptions caused by the pandemic. Sellers appear to be preparing their management teams to address such queries making the process as transparent and as informative as possible for the potential buyer. Undoubtedly, the buyer will find a prepared seller far more attractive.
Due to the uncertainty caused by COVID-19 the historical earnings of a target company are no longer a reliable measure of the future performance of its business. Agreeing a fixed price (locked box) for the shares of the target company before the acquisition is signed based on a set of accounts (be they audited year-end accounts or recently available management accounts) is therefore unlikely to be agreed by either the buyer or the seller.
In the current climate more creative pricing structures are being considered to allocate the risk relating to this financial uncertainty. Structures which allow the parties to potentially bridge the gap between what the buyer is willing to pay and what the seller is willing to accept. Whilst such structures have been used before they have not always been the popular choice due to their complexity and the additional negotiation required by the parties to implement such structures. Such structures are usually implemented where a particular risk regarding value has been identified which makes them an option to consider for parties where the underlying value of the business of the target company has been impacted (or is likely to be impacted) by COVID-19.
The following are pricing structures that may be considered either alone or in combination as a potential solution to bridging the valuation gap:
Yes. You could consider a joint venture (full function or contractual), collaboration or strategic partnership. Each of these structures will allow the parties to share financial risk and responsibility.
This Q&A does not constitute legal advice. Should you have any queries, or youwould like our assistance in considering the issues raised in this Q&A then please do not hesitate to contact the author of this article or your usual contact at Ince. Our team stands ready to assist.
Related Content:
COVID-19: Potential impact on M&A transactions
COVID-19: Transactional due diligence in a post COVID-19 world
23-03-2020 /
Both Buyers and Sellers will need to be mindful of the potential impact of COVID-19 on new and ongoing M&A transactions. There are a number of issues that the parties might consider addressing at various stages of the transaction to protect themselves and provide an agreeable approach where risk is identified.
27-07-2020 /
It is clear that COVID-19 has had an impact on M&A deal flow globally across many sectors.