Menu
IR35 and changes in private sector contracting arrangements

News / / IR35 and changes in private sector contracting arrangements

Current positionCurrently in private sector arrangements, the PSC (or other intermediary) is required to determine whether IR35 applies and the end user is not involved in this decision.If caught by IR35:The worker has to pay income tax and National Insurance Contributions (“NIC”) as if they were employed on the “deemed employment income”; ­Employer and employee’s national insurance contributions are payable by the worker’s PSC; ­The PSC needs to have a PAYE scheme. IR35 determination is complex but will often involve three core principles to determine employment status:Control – what degree of control does the end user have over what, how, when and where the worker completes the work?Substitution – is personal service by the worker required or can the worker send a substitute in their place?Mutuality of obligation – this is a concept where the end user is obliged to offer work, and the worker is obligated to accept it.Changes in legislation From 6 April 2017, IR35 reforms were introduced impacting the public sector. IR35 status for contractors is now determined by the end user on a project-by-project basis. Many end users in the public sector have taken a risk-averse approach and decided to apply IR35 as the default position in contracting arrangements and taxed the PSC as if it were an employee. Whilst the PSC may be taxed on an employment basis, the worker providing the services does not receive any statutory employment rights or benefits.From 6 April 2020 IR35 reforms already implemented in the public sector will be replicated for the private sector. An exemption from the IR35 changes is expected to be applied to small organisations which are likely to be determined as those with less than 50 employees.Impact The changes will shift the responsibility for making IR35 status assessments from the intermediary to the end user who pays the intermediary. They will need to decide whether the IR35 rules apply to an engagement with individuals who work through their own limited company. Where it is determined that the rules apply, they will be required to account to HMRC for PAYE, NIC and the apprenticeship levy (if relevant), for the PSC’s tax liability. The CEST test The CEST (Check Employment Status for Tax) online tool was introduced in March 2017 by HMRC ahead of the introduction of the IR35 changes in the public sector requiring the end user to account to HMRC. The tool can be used to check the employment status of PSCs. However, it has a reliability rate of 85% and so is not always conclusive. Companies should therefore ensure they collate key information to determine PSC status in the event of a dispute. In order for the CEST tool to produce an accurate result, the following information will need to be understood: The worker’s responsibilities; ­Who decides the work to be done; ­Who decides when, where and how the work needs to be done; ­How the worker is paid; ­If there are any benefits or expense reimbursements involved in the contract engagement.Three possible results will be returned from using CEST which may assist the end user with its decision on the responsibility to account to HMRC:The intermediaries legislation requiring the end user to account to HMRC applies; ­The intermediaries legislation requiring the end user to account to HMRC does not apply; ­Unable to determine.As can be seen from the “unable to determine” result the onus will remain on the end user to make the final determination.Action nowArrangements with contractors using intermediaries should be reviewed to ensure all parties understand the status of the arrangements, responsibilities and manage the impact of the new IR35 private sector rules. The following should be included in any such review:Does the contract allow the end user to deduct tax and NIC? ­Is there a right of worker substitution? ­What indemnities relating to tax are included in the contracts? ­Does the PSC have its own terms of business? ­Does the PSC’s commercial arrangements suggest it is a sustainable genuine business, for example logo, corporate letterhead, website, published insights, separate phone number? ­What services does the PSC provide to other clients? ­Does the contract allow flexibility about “how” the work is to be performed? ­Are there tight and specific task specifications in the contract?Significant financial consequences of being caught by existing IR35 rules have been demonstrated in a number of high-profile cases where the tax tribunal has made rulings for substantial backdated tax to be paid by workers who utilised an intermediary.As the end user will now be required to account for the intermediary’s tax, an additional administrative burden is imposed on the end user as well as a financial risk in the event HMRC seek to recover unpaid tax from the end user responsible for the collection of tax. Preparation is therefore now key in ensuring that the arrangements in place are those that the parties had intended.This article was co-authored by Jonathan Young, second year trainee solicitor.

Related sectors:

Related services:

Related news & insights

Insights / Countdown to COP27: recent developments

04-11-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure, Insurance

As we get ready for COP27, we've prepared a summary some of the key developments relating to climate and environmental policies over the last few weeks.

Countdown to COP27: recent developments

News / High Court rules on interpretation of termination for convenience clause

02-11-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

Optimares S.p.A. vs. Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C 2022 WL 06175341 (2022) A termination ‘for convenience’ clause generally allows the cancellation of a contract without fault in circumstances where performance is no longer required or the terminating party finds, at its will, that the agreement should be abandoned.

High Court rules on interpretation of termination for convenience clause

News / UAE Ministerial Directive Gives the Green Light towards Allowing Enforcement of English Court Judgments onshore the UAE

21-09-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

On 13 September 2022, the UAE Ministry of Justice (MOJ) issued a landmark directive to the President of the Dubai Courts, referring to a recent English Court judgment in Lenkor Energy Trading DMCC v Puri (2020) EWHC 75 (QB) which enforced a UAE Court judgment, and urging the Dubai Courts to take requisite steps to follow the principle of reciprocity when it comes to enforcing English Court judgments in the UAE.

UAE Ministerial Directive Gives the Green Light towards Allowing Enforcement of English Court Judgments onshore the UAE

News / Climate change litigation update: Derivative claim dismissed

06-07-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

McGaughey & Anor v Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 1233 (Ch) On 24 May 2022, the High Court refused a claim brought against the directors of the Universities Superannuation Scheme (the “USS”), the largest private pension scheme in the UK, for inaction around climate change commitments.

Climate change litigation update: Derivative claim dismissed

News / Refund guarantees – avoiding drafting pitfalls

12-05-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

Refund guarantees are often described as the cornerstones to shipbuilding projects and the buyer’s main security. Although they do not strictly form part of the shipbuilding contract, a shipbuilding project is unlikely to go ahead at all without one. It is therefore important to understand the different types of guarantee instruments, and the impact each has in practice on the guarantor’s obligations to pay and the buyer’s entitlement to recovery. A well-drafted guarantee provides certainty to the parties and strikes a balance between their respective entitlements and obligations.

Refund guarantees – avoiding drafting pitfalls