Menu
BEIS issues updated guidance on decommissioning

News / / BEIS issues updated guidance on decommissioning

The UK government’s Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) has recently issued, in draft, an updated version of its Guidance Notes on the Decommissioning of Offshore Oil and Gas Installations and Pipelines (the “Updated Notes”). The final version is expected in about April this year. In substance the Updated Notes are fundamentally unchanged and have at their heart the UK’s commitment to the OSPAR 98/3 decision, which laid down the guiding principle that all installations and offshore infrastructure should be removed unless a derogation is granted.

What the Updated Notes do seek to achieve is greater clarity regarding the obligations and expectations placed upon operators, marking an important point in the evolution of the decommissioning of the UK’s oil and gas infrastructure. 

The information now laid down regarding the decommissioning processes is primarily to be found in Annex H to the Updated Notes, entitled Decommissioning processes and pathways. It sets out three pathways, being:

1.  Pathway 1:  the full removal of the installation, which pathway applies to all installations under 10,000 tonnes and to all others for which there is no potential for a derogation.

2.  Pathway 2:  applies in respect of all decommissioning programmes with the potential for an application for an OSPAR derogation.

3.  Pathway 3:  applies in cases of pipeline decommissioning.

The three pathways are summarised, for the first time, in a flow diagram setting out the required process for each of the pathways. The general requirements for each pathway are then further set out.

The Updated Notes also provide developed guidance on what is required in the Environmental Appraisal and greater clarity around specific requirements and definitions. A key area here concerns the information that an operator must provide to support decommissioning decisions, particularly where it is considering a leave in situ option for pipelines.

Finally, the Updated Notes have been developed so far as post-decommissioning activities are required. These set out a risk-based approach to monitoring and the need for a long term management plan for any infrastructure that will remain in place.

Clearly the Updated Notes are primarily targeted at the operators, being the parties bearing the primary responsibility for decommissioning the assets they have exploited during their productive life. But operators will not be equipped to manage the decommissioning process in isolation and the service company sector will have a crucial role to play in the success of decommissioning oil and gas installations and infrastructure in the UK whether that be in the design, engineering, analysis of options, in the physical decommissioning work itself or in the post-decommissioning monitoring and management. In that sense, the UK government’s decommissioning policies and the Updated Notes will have a bearing on how operators and contractors alike conduct themselves throughout the decommissioning process, so are something that all interested parties need to be aware of.

At the time of going to press, BEIS has just issued a consultation on proposed updates to its Offshore Renewables Decommissioning Guidance for Industry. We will comment on any developments in this area in a  future update.

Related sectors:

Related news & insights

Insights / Countdown to COP27: recent developments

04-11-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure, Insurance

As we get ready for COP27, we've prepared a summary some of the key developments relating to climate and environmental policies over the last few weeks.

Countdown to COP27: recent developments

News / High Court rules on interpretation of termination for convenience clause

02-11-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

Optimares S.p.A. vs. Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C 2022 WL 06175341 (2022) A termination ‘for convenience’ clause generally allows the cancellation of a contract without fault in circumstances where performance is no longer required or the terminating party finds, at its will, that the agreement should be abandoned.

High Court rules on interpretation of termination for convenience clause

News / UAE Ministerial Directive Gives the Green Light towards Allowing Enforcement of English Court Judgments onshore the UAE

21-09-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

On 13 September 2022, the UAE Ministry of Justice (MOJ) issued a landmark directive to the President of the Dubai Courts, referring to a recent English Court judgment in Lenkor Energy Trading DMCC v Puri (2020) EWHC 75 (QB) which enforced a UAE Court judgment, and urging the Dubai Courts to take requisite steps to follow the principle of reciprocity when it comes to enforcing English Court judgments in the UAE.

UAE Ministerial Directive Gives the Green Light towards Allowing Enforcement of English Court Judgments onshore the UAE

News / Climate change litigation update: Derivative claim dismissed

06-07-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

McGaughey & Anor v Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 1233 (Ch) On 24 May 2022, the High Court refused a claim brought against the directors of the Universities Superannuation Scheme (the “USS”), the largest private pension scheme in the UK, for inaction around climate change commitments.

Climate change litigation update: Derivative claim dismissed

News / Refund guarantees – avoiding drafting pitfalls

12-05-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

Refund guarantees are often described as the cornerstones to shipbuilding projects and the buyer’s main security. Although they do not strictly form part of the shipbuilding contract, a shipbuilding project is unlikely to go ahead at all without one. It is therefore important to understand the different types of guarantee instruments, and the impact each has in practice on the guarantor’s obligations to pay and the buyer’s entitlement to recovery. A well-drafted guarantee provides certainty to the parties and strikes a balance between their respective entitlements and obligations.

Refund guarantees – avoiding drafting pitfalls