Joanna Steele
Partner
London
T +44 (0)20 7481 0010
JoannaSteele@incegd.com
Department Maritime, Dispute resolution Qualified England and Wales 1992 Education (University) Oxford University BA(Hons) Jurisprudence
Joanna has spent her entire legal career specialising in shipping and marine insurance advice and dispute resolution involving arbitration, the High Court and mediation.
Joanna advises shipowners, charterers, traders and their insurers on charterparty & COA problems, complex P&I claims and other disputes often involving vessel breakdowns and general average. She regularly advises on marine insurance policies and coverage issues. Her expertise encompasses contracts of carriage, charterparties, ship sale and shipbuilding contracts, as well as international sale contracts.
Quote
“My focus is on bringing my experience and detailed legal knowledge to bear in providing effective advice and sensible solutions for clients.”
Professional associations & memberships
LMAA, supporting member
What you may not know about Joanna
Interests in gastronomy and classical music provide important reasons for maintaining rusty conversational Italian and French.
Playing golf provides a continuing challenge – and frustration.
My matter highlights
Defence of cargo claims arising from eg loss of deck cargo and other marine casualties, associated indemnity claims and general average issues
Charterparty expertise: hire, liens, bunker quality, unsafe ports and other disputes
Marine insurance policy review and advice including Insurance Act issues
Established the modern law on the carriage of dangerous cargoes (the “GIANNIS NK”) [1998] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 337, with numerous subsequent cases involving dangerous cargoes
My testimonials and accolades
My recent publications
Insights / Court finds interim relief obtained from foreign court breached arbitration agreement
26-04-2022 / Maritime
The English Court has granted an anti-suit injunction to restrain court proceedings brought in Brazil because they breached a charterparty arbitration provision. Anti-suit relief was appropriate because the relief obtained from the Brazilian Court had not been sought in support of substantive proceedings elsewhere but in effect amounted to a determination that left nothing substantive to be decided in arbitration.
News / Court upholds claim for contaminated fuel oil
21-03-2022 / Maritime
This dispute, arising out of the sale and purchase of a quantity of crude oil, involved a number of contractual issues that commonly arise in commodities cases. Among other things, the Court considered what the terms of the sale contract were, whether there was a breach of the quality provisions and what was the appropriate measure of damages. Interestingly, the Court decided that this was not a “battle of the forms” scenario so the “last shot” doctrine did not apply in determining when the agreement was concluded and on what terms.
Insights / A distinction with a difference: Court of Appeal finds conflict between contractual terms
10-06-2021 / Maritime
Septo Trading Inc v. Tintrade Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 718
Insights / Court considers whether vessel remained on hire during period of arrest – what a difference a word makes
17-03-2021 / Maritime
Navision Shipping A/S v. Precious Pearls Ltd and Conti Lines Shipping NV v. Navision Shipping A/S (m.v. Mookda Naree) [2021] EWHC 558 (Comm)
Insights / Measuring profit or loss under long term contracts of affreightment
08-10-2020 / Maritime
Palmali Shipping SA v. Litasco SA [2020] EWHC 2581 (Comm)
