UK introduces new million pound penalties for breach of sanctions
On 31 January 2017, the UK introduced legislation imposing new monetary penalties for serious breaches of financial sanctions. The relevant part of the Policing and Crime Act 2017 has not yet come into force but is expected to do so in April 2017 and, once it does, it will give power to the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) to impose monetary penalties up to a significant permitted maximum for breaches of the regulations.
OFSI has already completed a consultation process on its proposed approach to implementation, the results and conclusions of which will in due course be published. However, in the draft guidance contained in the consultation document OFSI states its intention to ensure compliance, rather than wait until the law is broken and then respond to the breach. Among other things, OFSI has indicated that it will intervene to end breaches, tackle breaches effectively and try to change behaviour to prevent future non-compliance.
In broad terms, the permitted maximum for the amount of any penalty will be the greater of (a) £1 million, and (b) 50% of the estimated value of the funds or resources. Clearly therefore, under the new regime OFSI will have a wide discretion to impose huge fines. Companies need to be aware of these new penalties and take action to ensure compliance in their organization.
Furthermore, until now, breach of sanctions in the UK only gave rise to the risk of criminal penalties. These could only be imposed if the criminal standard of proof was met, in other words it has to be demonstrated “beyond reasonable doubt” that an offence has occurred. Under the new regime, OFSI need only establish the civil burden of proof. As such, it will have the power to impose penalties “on the balance of probabilities”. This lower burden of proof increases the risk of exposure to being penalized by OFSI for a suspected breach.
A breach does not have to occur within UK borders. OFSI’s guidance states that the UK’s financial sanctions regulations may be enforced against anyone in the UK; against companies and entities present in or dealing with other countries; against foreign nationals dealing with UK persons, companies or entities from their home country; and in situations where there is a connection to the UK (a “UK nexus”). A “UK nexus” could be created by such things as a UK company working overseas, an international transaction clearing or transiting through the UK, action by a local subsidiary of a UK parent company, or financial products or insurance bought on UK markets but held or used overseas.
A penalty may be imposed on either a legal person (a body) or an individual. OFSI may also impose a penalty on an officer of a body if the breach took place with the consent or connivance of that officer, or was attributable to any neglect on the part of the officer. Therefore, those in positions of responsibility within companies will need to ensure that they pay close attention to developments in sanctions legislation; ensure that compliance policies are in place; and, more importantly, ensure that they are followed. In addition, appropriate and thorough due diligence on counterparties remains vitally important.
In determining how to treat a breach, OFSI will take a number of factors into account. These include mitigating factors, such as voluntary disclosure, that might reduce a penalty or lead OFSI not to take enforcement action. Additionally, OFSI will consider aggravating factors, such as direct provision of funds to a designated person, circumvention of sanctions and deliberate acts, where the more they see the more likely that they will regard it as a serious case and impose a monetary penalty.
Importantly, as these are penalties intended to encourage compliance, details of them will be published. There is, therefore, the potential for significant adverse media coverage and possibly referral to regulators, which could give rise to additional fines. It, therefore, remains more important than ever to conduct thorough due diligence and understand sanctions regimes.
Related news & insights
Insights / Buyer beware – be certain of your grounds for termination
21-09-2020 / Commodities & Trade
Alegrow S.A. v. Yayla Agro Gida San Ve Nak A.S.  EWHC 1845 (Comm)
Insights / Court finds inspector’s certificate final and binding for limited purposes only
13-07-2020 / Commodities & Trade
In this case, the Court found that two different terms relating to cargo quality certificates in a sale contract for high sulphur fuel oil did not conflict.
News / ICC Incoterms 2020
13-09-2019 / Commodities & Trade
The International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) has announced the publication of Incoterms 2020. This is the first update to Incoterms since they were last revised in 2010. The new rules become effective from 1 January 2020.
News / Ince lawyers featured in this months issue of Marasi News
29-07-2019 / Commodities & Trade
In this month’s issue of Marasi News, Rania Tadros, Managing Partner and Natalie Jensen, Managing Associate, from our Ince Dubai office have written an article on war risks and the implications of trading in listed areas following the Joint War Committee’s decision to add the Persian Gulf and parts of the Arabian Gulf, including the Gulf of Oman, Oman and the UAE, to its Listed Areas for Hull War, Piracy, Terrorism and related perils. This is a topic that has become very significant and has far reaching consequences to the maritime industry, in particular Shipowners, Charterers and Traders in the region.
News / Iran sanctions update - June 2019
14-06-2019 / Commodities & Trade, Insurance
Iran sanctions - Escalating tensions
News / Liabilities for automated warehousing and distribution centres
25-02-2019 / Commodities & Trade
The growth in e-commerce has brought the efficiency of warehousing and distribution centres to the fore. Rather than being bottle-necks and costs centres, warehouses are increasingly being seen as an asset, providing opportunities for value-added services and cost efficiencies.