Freeports: how do they benefit businesses in the UK?

Insights / / Freeports: how do they benefit businesses in the UK?

In the 2021 Spring Budget, Rishi Sunak announced the creation of eight Freeports in England. These Freeports offer potential incentives for businesses located in such zones to benefit from tax breaks, and the ability to import and export goods free of tariffs and reduced administrative burdens. They may also provide opportunities for businesses supporting these activities, including shipping companies, construction companies and service providers.

What is a Freeport?

Freeports are areas that although are within a country’s geographical borders, are effectively outside the country’s customs borders. As well as the customs benefits that this brings, the Freeports being created in the UK will further benefit from incentives relating to tax, planning, regeneration and infrastructure.

Why are they being introduced?

The creation of Freeports in the UK has long been on the agenda of the Conservative Party. In 2016, writing as a backbench MP, Rishi Sunak authored a report extolling the benefits of Freeports, arguing that the UK should take advantage of the ‘economic freedom’ provided by Brexit to create Freeports across the nation. Boris Johnson referred to Freeports in his first speech as Prime Minister and the Conservative Party Manifesto included a commitment to create up to ten Freeports around the UK.

Freeports are being positioned as one of the ways the Government will achieve its ‘levelling-up’ agenda. The October 2020 consultation on Freeports claimed that they will attract investment and create jobs in some of the ‘most deprived communities around the UK’.

Whilst Freeports are designed to create new economic activity some critics argue that they only divert existing business into the area. However the Government’s main aim may be to make the UK’s Freeports more competitive than their EU rivals.

The UK is no longer subject to the EU’s state aid rules post-Brexit. Although there are Freeports in Europe (and there were Freeports in the UK until 2012), it has been argued that their effectiveness is limited by EU state aid rules. Some of the measures being applied to Freeports in the UK would not have been allowed under EU state aid rules. Whilst the UK Freeport measures go beyond EU state aid rules the UK remains bound by World Trade Organization rules on subsidies and its commitments under free trade agreements.

Where are these freeports located?

Each Freeport zone will include, as the name suggests, a port. Bids were invited from sea and shipping, air and rail ports. Seven of the eight Freeports will be located around shipping ports and one around an airport. The outer boundary of a Freeport is 45km/25 miles (this means that the furthest permitted distance between any two sites within the same Freeport is 45km). Under the proposed timetable Freeports will begin operations from late 2021.

The locations of the Freeports are as follows:

  • East Midlands Airport;
  • Felixstowe and Harwich;
  • Humber region;
  • Liverpool City Region;
  • Plymouth;
  • Solent;
  • Thames; and
  • Teesside.

On submission of a business case these sites will be able to access a share of £175 million of seed capital funding to support the development of Freeport sites. The expectation is that all Freeports will receive similar shares of the available £175 million fund, which would amount to nearly £22 million per site (larger bids will be considered in exceptional circumstances). This funding is for capital costs only and guidance states that proposals for seed funding are to be focused primarily on land assembly, site remediation, and small-scale transport infrastructure.

What are the benefits of freeports?

One of the main advantages for businesses considering setting up in a Freeport is that goods that arrive into Freeports are not subject to customs duty or import VAT unless and until the goods enter the UK market. Freeports are therefore particularly beneficial for businesses which buy goods with a high customs duty, such as textiles, and then process and re-export them, or sell them in other duty free markets such as airports. Operating out of a Freeport avoids the need to use bonded warehouses or Customs Warehousing Regimes. It has also been argued that businesses operating out of Freeports will face less ‘red tape’ and reduced paperwork costs.

Freeports will benefit from the following:

  • An enhanced 10% rate of Structures and Buildings Allowance (compared to the national 3% rate);
  • An enhanced capital allowance of 100% for companies investing in plant and machinery for use in Freeport sites. This applies to both main and special rate assets;
  • Full relief from Stamp Duty Land Tax on the purchase of land or property within the Freeport, if used for a qualifying commercial purpose; and
  • Full Business Rates relief. This will be available to all new businesses and certain existing businesses (where they expand).

These reliefs apply until 30 September 2026; it is not clear what will happen after that point. 

It is also proposed to allow employer National Insurance contributions relief from April 2022, until April 2026 (this is subject to parliamentary approval).

Next steps

If you are considering setting up a business in a Freeport to take advantage of the incentives detailed above, our experienced lawyers can provide expert advice on all the relevant aspects of tax, property, employment and corporate law. Please contact Huw Witty, Head of Tax, or Rachel Bennion, Trainee Solicitor, for further information.

Huw Witty

Huw Witty Partner, Head of Tax

Related sectors:

Related services:


Related news & insights

News / Ince celebrates one year since Scotland office opening

23-11-2022 / Insurance, Maritime, Real Estate

We are pleased to be celebrating one year since opening our first Scottish office in the city of Glasgow.  Stefanie Johnston, dual-qualified Partner and Head of Scotland, has worked tirelessly over the last year to develop our offering through the opening of an Ince office in what is arguably an established Scottish market. Starting from the ground up, Stefanie and her team have successfully gained an admirable reputation in the region and further afield in the maritime, insurance, real estate and regulatory sectors. 

Ince celebrates one year since Scotland office opening

News / Shipping E-brief November 2022

17-11-2022 / Maritime

The Shipping E-Brief is a publication providing you with key information on legal decisions and developments in shipping and related business areas.

Shipping E-brief November 2022

News / Appeals from arbitration: is reform required?

15-11-2022 / Maritime

In September 2022, the UK Law Commission published a consultation paper with provisional recommendations for updating the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act 1996). Amongst other things, the Law Commission considered whether any changes need to be made to: (i) s.67 of the Act 1996, which deals with jurisdictional challenges to arbitral awards; and (ii) s.69 of the Act 1996, which deals with appeals on points of law.

Appeals from arbitration: is reform required?

News / Owners not in breach of charter and entitled to claim demurrage

09-11-2022 / Maritime

CM P-MAX III Limited v. Petroleos Del Norte SA (MT Stena Primorsk) [2022] EWHC 2147 (Comm) This recent laytime and demurrage dispute demonstrates that an owner can legitimately refuse orders where such orders may jeopardise the safety of a vessel.

Owners not in breach of charter and entitled to claim demurrage

News / Court of Appeal finds owner should have accepted non-contractual performance

09-11-2022 / Maritime

Mur Shipping BV v. RTI Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1406 A majority of the Court of Appeal has held that the Owner under a contract of affreightment (COA) should have accepted payment of freight in Euros, rather than the US dollars provided for in the COA. Its refusal to do so meant that the Owner could not rely on the force majeure clause in the COA, in circumstances where US sanctions might have restricted US dollar transfers from or on behalf of the Charterer.

Court of Appeal finds owner should have accepted non-contractual performance

News / “Due” means due!

03-11-2022 / Maritime

Ceto Shipping Corporation v. Savory Inc (Victor 1) [2022] EWHC 2636 (Comm) The Court in this case had to construe a purchase option clause in a bareboat charter. Specifically, it considered whether the fact that the charterer had not fulfilled certain payment obligations under the charter because it was disputing them in good faith meant that the owner was not obliged to transfer title to the vessel at the end of the charter period.

“Due” means due!