UK imposes prohibition on port entry and UK registration to Russian linked shipping

News / / London

In a development that will have a potentially wide-ranging impact on shipping, the UK has introduced a prohibition on Russian-connected ships from (i) using UK ports and (ii) being registered in the UK.

In summary, the UK, by virtue of Statutory Instrument “The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) (Amendment) (No.4) Regulations 2022”, has further expanded the scope of the sanctions against Russia, with these restrictions entering into force on 1 March 2022.

The new restrictions prohibit a person, including the Master or pilot of a ship, from providing a ship with access to a UK port, if the person knows, or has reasonable cause to suspect, that the ship:

  1. Is owned, controlled, chartered or operated by a designated person;
  2. Is owned, controlled, chartered or operated by persons connected with Russia;
  3. Is Russian flagged;
  4. Is Russian registered; or
  5. Is otherwise a specified ship.

A port barring direction (i.e. the direction prohibiting a ship from entering a port) may also be given by the Secretary of State or harbour authority to the master or pilot of a specified ship and further steps can be taken to restrict the movement or detain such ships.

A person connected to Russia includes:

  1. An individual who is, or an association or combination of individuals who are, ordinarily resident or located in Russia; and
  2. A person, other than an individual, which is incorporated or constituted under the law of Russia or domiciled in Russia.

Furthermore, a person is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by another person if either one or both of the following two conditions are met:

  1. The person holds directly or indirectly more than 50% of the shares, voting rights or holds the right, directly or indirectly, to appoint or remove a majority of the board of directors;
  2. It is reasonable, having regard to all the circumstances, that the person, if they chose to, would be able in most cases or in significant respects, by whatever means and whether directly or indirectly, to achieve the result that the affairs of the other person are conducted in accordance with that person’s wishes.

In addition to the port restrictions, the UK Registrar must refuse to register a ship, if on the basis of information given to the Registrar by the Secretary of State or accompanying the application for registration, the ship appears to the Registrar to be owned, controlled, charterer or operated by (a) designated persons, or (b) persons connected with Russia. The Secretary of State may also direct the Registrar to terminate the registration of such ships or a specified ship.

As the restrictions have just entered into force, there are likely to be implications for ships due to call at UK ports, particularly where bills of lading have been issued requiring delivery in the UK. It remains to be seen how such restrictions will be enforced in practice and, indeed, whether other countries will take similar steps. We would advise parties dealing with these issues to carefully consider the steps they take, particularly those shipowners who will owe duties not only to charterers under their chartering arrangements but also under the bill of lading to cargo interests. These interests may not be aligned.

Ince offer a comprehensive sanctions risk and advice service utilising some of the most sophisticated data analytics systems available. We also have an arrangement with New York sanctions specialists Seward & Kissel and are able to provide complete coverage on UK, USA and EU sanctions. Please contact Fionna Gavin, Julian Clark or James Rose for further information.
Fionna Gavin

Fionna Gavin Partner

James Rose

James Rose Managing Associate

Related sectors:

Related news & insights

News / Ince celebrates one year since Scotland office opening

23-11-2022 / Insurance, Maritime, Real Estate

We are pleased to be celebrating one year since opening our first Scottish office in the city of Glasgow.  Stefanie Johnston, dual-qualified Partner and Head of Scotland, has worked tirelessly over the last year to develop our offering through the opening of an Ince office in what is arguably an established Scottish market. Starting from the ground up, Stefanie and her team have successfully gained an admirable reputation in the region and further afield in the maritime, insurance, real estate and regulatory sectors. 

Ince celebrates one year since Scotland office opening

News / Shipping E-brief November 2022

17-11-2022 / Maritime

The Shipping E-Brief is a publication providing you with key information on legal decisions and developments in shipping and related business areas.

Shipping E-brief November 2022

News / Appeals from arbitration: is reform required?

15-11-2022 / Maritime

In September 2022, the UK Law Commission published a consultation paper with provisional recommendations for updating the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act 1996). Amongst other things, the Law Commission considered whether any changes need to be made to: (i) s.67 of the Act 1996, which deals with jurisdictional challenges to arbitral awards; and (ii) s.69 of the Act 1996, which deals with appeals on points of law.

Appeals from arbitration: is reform required?

News / Owners not in breach of charter and entitled to claim demurrage

09-11-2022 / Maritime

CM P-MAX III Limited v. Petroleos Del Norte SA (MT Stena Primorsk) [2022] EWHC 2147 (Comm) This recent laytime and demurrage dispute demonstrates that an owner can legitimately refuse orders where such orders may jeopardise the safety of a vessel.

Owners not in breach of charter and entitled to claim demurrage

News / Court of Appeal finds owner should have accepted non-contractual performance

09-11-2022 / Maritime

Mur Shipping BV v. RTI Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1406 A majority of the Court of Appeal has held that the Owner under a contract of affreightment (COA) should have accepted payment of freight in Euros, rather than the US dollars provided for in the COA. Its refusal to do so meant that the Owner could not rely on the force majeure clause in the COA, in circumstances where US sanctions might have restricted US dollar transfers from or on behalf of the Charterer.

Court of Appeal finds owner should have accepted non-contractual performance

News / “Due” means due!

03-11-2022 / Maritime

Ceto Shipping Corporation v. Savory Inc (Victor 1) [2022] EWHC 2636 (Comm) The Court in this case had to construe a purchase option clause in a bareboat charter. Specifically, it considered whether the fact that the charterer had not fulfilled certain payment obligations under the charter because it was disputing them in good faith meant that the owner was not obliged to transfer title to the vessel at the end of the charter period.

“Due” means due!