Menu
Shipping E-Brief May 2020

News / / Shipping E-Brief May 2020

The Shipping E-Brief is a publication providing you with key information on legal decisions and developments in shipping and related business areas.

Download the PDF version

Missed a previous edition? Read them here:

Shipping E-Brief March 2020

Shipping E-Brief January 2020

Shipping E-Brief November 2019

Related sectors:

Featured news & insights

News / Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over hull underwriters’ claims against mortgagee bank in vessel scuttling case

03-04-2020 / Maritime

Aspen Underwriting Ltd and others (Appellants) v. Credit Europe Bank NV (Atlantik Confidence) [2020] UKSC 11 In a decision that will be significant for marine and other insurers, the Supreme Court has found that the English courts did not have jurisdiction over claims brought by the hull underwriters of the vessel, Atlantik Confidence, as against the Dutch bank that was the mortgagee of the vessel and also the assignee of the insurance policy and the loss payee. The Supreme Court held that the bank was not bound by the exclusive English jurisdiction clauses in the policy or the settlement agreement with the vessel owners and managers. Nor could the underwriters rely on the special insurance provisions in the recast Brussels Regulation to establish English Court jurisdiction over their claims. The underwriters are now faced with the prospect of pursuing their claims against the bank in the Netherlands.

Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over hull underwriters’ claims against mortgagee bank in vessel scuttling case

Insights / Failure to produce bills of lading in support of demurrage claim bars entire claim

07-04-2020 / Maritime

Tricon Energy Ltd v. MTM Trading LLC (MTM Hong Kong) [2020] EWHC 700 (Comm) The Commercial Court has held that where a charterparty requires demurrage to be calculated by reference to bill of lading quantities, and incorporates a demurrage time bar which requires provision of all supporting documents, a claim for demurrage will be time-barred if the shipowner fails to provide copies of the bills of lading within the required time.

Failure to produce bills of lading in support of demurrage claim bars entire claim

News / We demand that you see to this guarantee right away

08-04-2020 / Maritime

Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd v. Reignwood International Investment (Group) Company Limited [2020] EWHC 803 (Comm) The Commercial Court has recently given an important decision that highlights how the different types of guarantee provided under shipbuilding contracts can have important consequences as to how quickly a demand has to be paid.

We demand that you see to this guarantee right away

News / Hong Kong Court affirms rule that arbitration clauses must be expressly incorporated into bills of lading

07-04-2020 / Maritime

OCBC Wing Hang Bank Ltd v. Kai Sen Shipping Co Ltd (Yue You 903) [2020] HKCFI 375 This recent Hong Kong case confirms the rule that express wording must be used in order to incorporate an arbitration clause from a charterparty into a bill of lading. General words of incorporation will not be sufficient.

Hong Kong Court affirms rule that arbitration clauses must be expressly incorporated into bills of lading

News / Court exhibits reluctance to interfere in arbitral process

15-04-2020 / Maritime

Daelim Corporation v. (1) Bonita Company Limited (2) Eastern Media International Corporation and (3) Far Eastern Silo & Shipping (Panama) S.A. (DL Carnation) [2020] EWHC 697 (Comm)

Court exhibits reluctance to interfere in arbitral process

News / Experts’ fiduciary duty of loyalty to clients: practical implications for marine and offshore sectors

22-04-2020 / Maritime

A Company v. X, Y and Z [2020] EWHC 809 (TCC) In this case, companies of the same group were retained as experts by opposing sides in two related arbitration references in respect of an offshore construction project. The Court found that the whole company group, in its capacity as expert, owed a fiduciary duty of loyalty to their client, which was not inconsistent with an expert’s paramount duty to the Court or Tribunal. On this basis, the Court granted an injunction prohibiting the expert group of companies from acting for another party in the arbitration. This decision highlights the need for clients to be quick in retaining their experts when facing complex marine or offshore disputes, given that the number of experts able to give evidence in relation to these fields in courts and tribunals is very limited.

Experts’ fiduciary duty of loyalty to clients: practical implications for marine and offshore sectors

News / Court dismisses defences to non-performance under contract of affreightment

07-05-2020 / Maritime

Classic Maritime Inc v. Limbungan Makmur Sdn Bhd and another company [2020] EWHC 619 (Comm) This was the latest dispute under a Contract of Affreightment (“COA”) between Classic Maritime Inc (“Owners”) and Limbungan Makmur Sdn Bhd (“Charterers”), with the Owners claiming damages for unperformed shipments under the COA. In reaching its decision, the Court relied closely on an earlier Court of Appeal judgment relating to the Owners’ claim for damages involving seven unperformed shipments.

Court dismisses defences to non-performance under contract of affreightment