Paul Ho Head of Greater China, Partner & Chief Representative, Shanghai
Ince recognised as a Top Ranked Leading Firm in The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2022
The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2022 results have been published; our shipping practice in China and Hong Kong retained their Tier 1 ranking, and partners Paul Ho and David Beaves were ranked in the "Hall of Fame" for a second consecutive year since its inception in 2020. Rosita Lau was also ranked in the “Hall of Fame” for a third consecutive year. Ince has the largest number of “Hall of Fame” shipping lawyers from a single firm on the list.
Furthermore, our new partners Ruaridh Guy and Richard Oakley have been ranked as the Next Generation Partners in Shipping in Hong Kong for the first time, and Lorraine Mok was recognised as a Rising Star in Ship Finance.
The Legal 500 quotes:
The 'very attentive and knowledgeable' team at Ince has 'an encyclopaedic knowledge of shipping law' and provides 'sound and pragmatic advice' across the panoply of wet and dry shipping matters. Its client roster includes shipowners, port and terminal owners, and P&I clubs. Ince‘s full-service shipping practice handles a plethora of shipping work, as well as associated areas, including litigation, corporate, regulatory and finance matters.
The 'vastly experienced' Rosita Lau has a strong track record in handling shipping litigation and arbitration, and she is also accomplished in mediation.
The 'very commercial' Max Cross is another senior member of the team, who has built up a very strong reputation arresting ships and securing their release, and he is also instructed in complex multijurisdictional fraud disputes.
Senior Partner David Beaves has a transactional focus to his practice, including finance, corporate and commercial matters that intersect with the shipping sector.
Ince has a strong presence in the insurance sector, as is reflected by the fact that it acts for insurers, reinsurers, brokers and policy holders, among many other clients. Its workload covers a broad cross-section of contentious and non-contentious matters, such as M&A, regulatory compliance, corporate governance and product liability.
Kelvin Lee co-heads the practice with Rosita Lau, who is an expert in transportation-related insurance issues, as well as those concerning heavy machinery, property damage and personal injury.
At the more junior end of the spectrum, recently-promoted Partner Ruaridh Guy has 'much more experience than his age would show'. Master Mariner Richard Oakley is another name to note.
Client testimonials include:
‘It is one of the top shipping firms – they have an encyclopaedic knowledge of shipping law – hugely experienced.’
‘I have always found the team to be prepared, involved, detail-oriented and strategic. They are a pleasure to work with and have deep knowledge of the shipping business.’
‘The lawyers give sound and pragmatic advice.’
‘The team is very attentive and knowledgeable.‘
‘Max Cross is the stand-out partner. Clients love him, and he has a very commercial approach to cases.’
‘Ruaridh Guy is a brilliant young partner. He has much more experience than his age would show, and he is a pleasure to work with.’
‘Ruaridh Guy is our go-to attorney for maritime claims matters. His depth and breadth of legal skills set him in a tier of its own.’
‘Ruaridh Guy is capable of providing accurate and practical legal advice within a very short timeframe. He has very high awareness on the client’s business needs, and clients have high regard to the legal services he has rendered.’
Related news & insights
News / Shipping E-brief May 2022
16-05-2022 / Maritime
The Shipping E-Brief is a publication providing you with key information on legal decisions and developments in shipping and related business areas.
News / Court dismisses appeal from arbitration award that challenged findings of fact
09-05-2022 / Maritime
Laysun Service Co Limited v. Del Monte International GMBH  EWHC 699 (Comm) This was a dispute under a contract of affreightment, in which the arbitral tribunal made an award in the Charterers’ favour. The Owners subsequently appealed, alleging that the tribunal had erred in its findings on issues of law. The Court, however, dismissed the challenge, concluding that the Owners were in fact seeking to impugn the arbitrators’ findings of fact, which were not open for appeal.
News / The IPCC Report and its impact on shipping
09-05-2022 / Maritime
In April 2022, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published the Working Group III report on “Mitigation of Climate Change”, the third instalment of the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report. This follows the Working Group I report on “The Physical Science Basis” and the Working Group II report on “Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability”.
News / Electronic trade documents: the Law Commission’s recommended reforms
09-05-2022 / Maritime
The Law Commission of England and Wales has now published its final report on electronic trade documents, together with draft legislation for intended presentation to Parliament by May 2022.
News / Court dismisses financing bank’s misdelivery claim for lack of title to sue
04-05-2022 / Maritime
Unicredit Bank AG v. Euronav NV (Sienna)  EWHC 957 (Comm) This was a claim brought by a bank that financed the purchase of a cargo and subsequently sought to recover damages for misdelivery following discharge of the cargo without production of the original bill of lading. The claim failed because, in the circumstances of this case, the bill of lading that had been endorsed to the Bank did not contain or evidence the contract of carriage in respect of the cargo.
Insights / Court corrects obvious accounting mistake in arbitration award
27-04-2022 / Maritime
In a charterparty dispute, the Court has set aside part of an arbitration award on the grounds that the arbitrator reached a conclusion that was contrary to the common position of the parties, and for which neither party contended, without providing an opportunity for the parties to address him on the issue. In the circumstances, this represented a failure to conduct the proceedings fairly. The decision provides useful guidance on how to proceed where a tribunal makes an obvious mistake in its award but declines to remedy it.