Ince receives another prestigious Maritime Law Award in Asia
Ince' Asia maritime team is extremely honoured and pleased to win once again and for the eighth time the prestigious Maritime Law Award at Seatrade Maritime Awards Asia 2020 on 23 June 2020. The Award recognises the law firm that can demonstrate the highest level of commitment and expertise in the maritime legal sector in Asia.
Providing services of the highest standard to our clients and be the number one choice of maritime lawyers for our clients have all along been our objective. We are committed to continue with the mission. With a history of 150 years globally and more than 40 years of presence in Asia, we are a pioneer in providing international maritime legal services in the region. Our Asia offices (Hong Kong, Shanghai, Beijing and Singapore) have been providing an all-rounded shipping practice with our highly experienced, multi-jurisdictional qualified and multilingual shipping team who deal with on a daily basis all types of both contentious maritime matters (admiralty / wet shipping matters including casualties, marine pollution, collision, salvage, grounding, wreck removal and privacy; and dry shipping matters including charterparties, bills of lading, carriage of goods by sea, shipbuilding, sanctions, regulatory compliance, ship registration, maritime insurance, insurance regulatory, personal injuries, and connected international trade) and non-contentious transactional maritime matters (including ship sale and purchase, shipping finance, ship leasing, joint venture, connected corporate transactional projects, escrow services and ship registration).
In 2019/2020 we had made new law for the global maritime law and industry and we had lawyers who received further prestigious and unique individual awards and accolades.
This year the annual Seatrade Maritime Awards Asia is entering its 13th edition since its establishment in 2008, and Ince is the 8-times winner of the Seatrade Maritime Maritime Law Award. This is a record and strong affirmation of Ince’s market leading reputation and outstanding achievements in the maritime industry. We are truly honoured for the distinguished judges’ recognition of our competence. This is a huge encouragement for us to continue to serve the maritime industry. We are also extremely grateful to our clients and other players of the industry for their continued support and confidence in us.
The announcement of Ince winning the Maritime Law Award was made during an innovative online ceremony held on 23 June 2020 attended by numerous key industry players from around the world. At the ceremony, Ince was described by the judges as a firm which acts as a collaborative and proactive partner serving clients across Europe, the Middle East and Asia with clearly defined commitment and targets and which always provides updated topical and current information to clients.
This year’s panel of judges comprises heavyweight maritime figures who are leading and respectable professionals in their fields. They are:
Mr Gerardo Borromeo, Vice Chairman and CEO, PTC Group of Companies
Ms Magdalene Chew, President, WISTA and Director, Asia Legal LLC
Capt Subhangshu Dutt, Vice Chairman, Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers (Singapore Branch)
Mr Koichi Fujiwara, Chairman of the Board of Directors, ClassNK
Ms Maite Klarup, General Manager, BIMCO Singapore
Ms Caroline Yang, President, Singapore Shipping Association
In addition to the Seatrade Maritime Maritime Law Awards, our Asia offices have been receiving many others awards over the years, including Lloyd’s List Asia Maritime Law Award, Ship Finance Team of the Year Award of Seatrade Maritime Awards Asia, Best in Dispute Resolution (Shipping) Award and Best in Dispute Resolution (Insurance) Award of Asialaw, and Best in Shipping, Best in Insurance and Best in Trade firm of China Business Law Journal. We have all along been ranked as a Tier 1 Shipping Firm by Legal 500 Asia Pacific and a Band 1 Shipping Firm by Chambers Asia Pacific.
Related news & insights
News / Court considers impact of sanctions on bareboat charterparty obligations
06-02-2023 / Maritime
This bareboat charterparty dispute is noteworthy for the Court’s findings on the effect of international sanctions on the Charterers’ obligations to make payment and the Owners’ obligations to nominate a bank account into which payment could be made pursuant to the contractual purchase option.
News / Shipping E-brief February 2023
06-02-2023 / Maritime
The Shipping E-Brief is a publication providing you with key information on legal decisions and developments in shipping and related business areas.
News / Court considers scope of charterparty provision restricting deductions from hire
30-01-2023 / Maritime, Yachts & Superyachts
The Court recently considered the following question: “Where a charterparty clause provides that no deductions from hire (including for off-hire or alleged off-hire) may be made without the shipowner’s consent: is non-payment of hire a ‘deduction’ if the Vessel is off hire at the instalment date?”
News / Court confirms applicable package limit when cargo interests have to pay salvage
23-01-2023 / Maritime
Court confirms applicable package limit when cargo interests have to pay salvage Trafigura Pte Ltd v. TKK Shipping Pte Ltd (Thor Lineage)  EWHC 26 (Comm)
Insights / The Third Party Litigation Funding Law Review Sixth Edition Contribution from UAE Partners
09-01-2023 / Maritime
We are delighted to share that Mohamed El Hawawy, Joint Managing Partner, and Natalie Jensen, Partner, from our Dubai office, have contributed the UAE chapter to the recently published Sixth Edition of the Third Party Litigation Funding Law Review.
News / Court declines anti-enforcement injunction in charterparty dispute
19-12-2022 / Maritime
In a charterparty dispute, the Court has declined to grant an anti-enforcement injunction in respect of foreign proceedings because it found that there was no binding arbitration agreement between the parties. The decision also highlights that delay can be a bar to the grant of an anti-suit injunction. Read Peter McNamee and Reema Shour’s article for an analysis of the Court’s conclusions.