Rania Tadros Partner
Consolidation of Dubai’s arbitration centres - The impact on maritime arbitration in the region
Decree No. (34) of 2021 (“the Decree”) on the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”) was recently issued. Pursuant to the Decree, the Dubai International Financial Centre Arbitration Institute (“DIFC Arbitration Institute”) and Emirates Maritime Arbitration Centre (“EMAC”) shall be dissolved and their assets and operations shall be merged into the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”). The move is considered to be a further measure to position Dubai as a leading global centre for arbitration by increasing the efficiency of the various arbitration centres in Dubai.
We comment on the impact this has on maritime arbitration in the region.
EMAC, the specialised maritime arbitration centre was established under Decree No. (14) of 2016 to supervise the processes of mediation and arbitration of maritime related disputes as a “hybrid-form, ad hoc arbitration with a light touch case management and regulations that allow for emergency arbitration and fast tracking”. EMAC was the only arbitration centre in the region specifically with the intention of resolving disputes within the maritime sector.
The Decree calls for the transfer to DIAC of all assets belonging to EMAC, together with all financial allocation from the government of Dubai.
In terms of existing agreements which refer disputes to the DIFC Arbitration Institute and EMAC, DIAC shall be deemed to have replaced these centres and shall have the jurisdiction to consider and determine the disputes. In addition, any current ongoing arbitrations in the DIFC Arbitration Institute or EMAC will continue pursuant to the centres’ rules and procedures but will be subject to the supervision by DIAC, unless the parties agree otherwise.
The measures introduced by the Decree consolidate and centralise arbitration in Dubai. It does however mean that the specialist maritime disputes which EMAC was servicing will now be dealt with by a larger arbitration body. Whilst parties with shipping related disputes have always been free to use the DIAC or DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre, EMAC was the only arbitration centre in the region created specifically with the intention of resolving disputes within the maritime sector and its Rules were drafted accordingly. This had the advantage of allowing the centre to be tailored to the needs of the shipping industry. Having a UAE based specialised maritime centre for disputes instilled a confidence in parties based locally that their maritime disputes could be dealt with by expertise in the region to rival other global maritime arbitration centres such as the London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA) and Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration (SCMA) which have long been popular maritime arbitration centres. The Decree does however suggest that expertise involved in EMAC will be retained in the new system.
The objective of DIAC is to strengthen the position of Dubai as a reliable arbitration centre and an efficient and effective means of resolving disputes through best international practices. Dubai continues to take measures to position itself as a leading global centre in respect of alternative dispute resolution.
Parties which have agreed to disputes being governed by the DIFC Arbitration Institute or EMAC will not be able to have these centres consider their new claims going forward but will rather have any disputes governed by DIAC unless the parties agree otherwise. With this in mind, parties may wish to take a proactive step to revisit any contracts and/or standard terms which provide for disputes to be governed by the DIFC Arbitration Institute or EMAC in advance of a dispute arising where possible and expressly replace the centres with DIAC or an alternative Arbitration body.
Related news & insights
News / Ince recognised as a Top Ranked Leading Firm in The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2022
18-01-2022 / Maritime
The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2022 results have been published; our shipping practice in China and Hong Kong retained their Tier 1 ranking, and partners Paul Ho and David Beaves ranked as "Hall of Fame" for a second consecutive year since its inception in 2020. Rosita Lau was also ranked in the “Hall of Fame” for a third consecutive year. Ince has the largest number of “Hall of Fame” shipping lawyers from a single firm on the list.
News / Ince achieve top rankings in the new Chambers and Partners Greater China Region 2022 Guide
18-01-2022 / Insurance, Maritime
The firm maintained its high rankings in Shipping and Insurance across China and Hong Kong jurisdictions.
News / MEPC 77 and its impact on decarbonisation of shipping
23-12-2021 / Maritime
We know that the Glasgow Climate Pact was agreed at COP 26, emphasising the urgent need for a rapid and sustained decline of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The Marine Environment Protection Committee’s 77th meeting (MEPC 77), held two weeks after, was considered by many as a key test of IMO’s ability to act upon the Paris Agreement targets by delivering a number of GHG reduction measures.
Insights / Court of Appeal finds charterers’ associated company not barge “operator” for limitation purposes
21-12-2021 / Maritime
This was a dispute over whether an associate company of the charterers was entitled to limit its liability in respect of a barge that was involved in an incident off Dover that resulted in a claim for about Euros 55 million worth of damage.
Insights / Court of Appeal confirms seller’s obligation to return advance payment following non-delivery of goods
20-12-2021 / Maritime
Nord Naphtha Ltd v. New Stream Trading AG  EWCA Civ 1829
News / Meet the Seatrade Maritime 20 Under 40: Leaders of Tomorrow – Natalie Jensen and Paul Katsouris
15-12-2021 / Maritime
Meet the Seatrade Maritime 20 Under 40: Leaders of Tomorrow