Offshore oil and gas safety - a regulatory overhaul

News /

Environment analysis: The Offshore Safety Directive, adopted by the EU in 2013, aims to prevent major accidents relating to offshore gas and oil operations. Clare Kempkens and Rachel Bernie of Ince & Co look at the main objectives of the Directive and consider the impact of the implementing regulations in the UK when they come into force in July 2015.

Original news

Offshore Petroleum Licensing (Offshore Safety Directive) Regulations 2015, LNB News 23/03/2015 175.

SI 2015/385: The European Commission’s Directive 2013/30/ EU on the safety of offshore oil and gas operations (Offshore Safety Directive) and its requirements relating to licensing and certain environmental matters relating to emergency response is implemented in the UK on 19 July 2015.

What are the main objectives of the Offshore Safety Directive and the implementing regulations?

The Offshore Safety Directive has its origins in the EU’s response to the Macondo disaster in 2010 in which a gas release and explosion occurred on an oil rig in the US Gulf of Mexico. Following a review, the EU Commission felt that the Macondo incident highlighted the EU offshore oil and gas industry’s lack of universal mandatory safety procedures. In particular, it suggested a fragmented regulatory structure and lack of any overarching, cohesive legislative framework.

The EU adopted the Offshore Safety Directive on 10 June 2013 with the stated aim ‘to reduce as far as possible the occurrence of major accidents relating to offshore oil and gas operations and to limit their consequences’.

How will the regulations be implemented?

The UK is required to implement the Offshore Safety Directive via its national legislative framework. In order to meet the requirements of the new Directive, three existing UK regulations are to be amended and three additional pieces of legislation are to be introduced, as follows:

Amended regulations

  • the Offshore Installations (Presentation of Fire and Explosion, and Emergency Response) Regulations 1995, SI 1995/743;
  • the Offshore Installations and Pipelines Works (Management and Administration) Regulations 1995, SI 1995/738; and
  • the Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co-operation Convention) Regulations 1998, SI 1998/1056.

Additional regulations

  • the Offshore Installations (Offshore Safety Directive) (Safety Case etc) Regulations 2015, SI 2015/398;
  • the Offshore Petroleum Activities (Offshore Safety Directive) (Environmental Functions) Regulations 2015; and
  • the Offshore Petroleum Licensing (Offshore Safety Directive) Regulations 2015, SI 2015/385 (Offshore Licensing Regulations).

The majority of the Offshore Safety Directive’s requirements will be transposed into national law by the Offshore Installations (Offshore Safety Directive) (Safety Case etc) Regulations 2015. As far as the UK is concerned, many of the requirements are met in already stringent regulation but operators and contractors will still see some significant changes and differing terminology.

The Offshore Licensing Regulations have been drawn up in order to bring in the specific licensing requirements of the Offshore Safety Directive. They establish the criteria which companies undertaking offshore activities (such as, for example, exploration work or petroleum extraction) will have to meet in order to obtain an offshore license and set out the duties imposed upon them.

The Offshore Licensing Regulations provide that the licensee cannot appoint an installation or well operator without giving written notice of the proposed operator’s appointment to the licensing authority. Furthermore, they place a duty on the licensee to ensure there are adequate provisions to cover any liabilities that may arise from the offshore operations. In particular, financial responsibility is placed on the licensee in respect of the prevention and remediation of environmental damage that may be caused. Finally, it is also noteworthy that the Offshore Licensing Regulations now provide that a breach of their provisions will constitute grounds for the termination of the operatorship or revocation of the license.

What do stakeholders make of these changes?

The EU Commission’s original proposal for an EU regulation with direct effect throughout the EU member states was greeted with considerable concern by UK stakeholders. There was a widely held view that the UK’s offshore regulation was in a large part already fit for purpose following the implementation of the Cullen Report in 1990, and a concern that an EU regulation might undermine it.

Generally, since the proposal was amended to take the form of a directive there has been greater support. It is recognised that there will be costs involved in stakeholder compliance but the industry is safety conscious and highly motivated when it comes to improving safety standards for those working offshore and reducing the risk of future offshore accidents.

Are the changes likely to succeed?

The EU Commission’s decision to introduce its desired reforms via a directive rather than a regulation seems a sensible one. The greater flexibility afforded to member states in implementing the requirements should greatly increase the chances of the Offshore Safety Directive’s success.

However, success may ultimately prove difficult to measure. In jurisdictions with sophisticated offshore regimes day-to-day success is likely to depend upon the ability of the Offshore Safety Directive to enhance existing systems without adding unnecessary complexity. In jurisdictions with emerging offshore fields, the Directive will need to promote new systems. The EU Commission has taken a pro-active stance so far and there seems every likelihood that it will continue to enforce progress in this area. A key area of difficulty seems likely to be the implementation of realistic financial responsibility requirements. These will need to strike the right balance between making proper provision for potential liabilities and avoiding stifling industry growth.

What do affected parties need to be doing between now and when the regulations come into force in July 2015?

In so far as the safety regime is concerned, a transitional period has been granted for existing installations, allowing parties involved with ongoing operations until 19 July 2018 to comply with the new regulations.

Otherwise, the regulations (including the Offshore Licensing Regulations) will apply from 19 July 2016. In the UK the offshore industry body, Oil and Gas UK, is providing significant guidance and assistance.

Affected parties will need to give thought to who will be the operator for the purposes of the regulations and ensure that the requirements of the regulations can be met. Licensees will need to be aware of the additional requirements and potential liabilities placed upon them and manage their risks accordingly.

Further assistance from the government is also expected, with guidance for the offshore industry on the changes introduced by the regulations due to be published by the Department of Energy & Climate Change and the Health and Safety Executive in April 2015.

Clare Kempkens is a partner in energy and shipping at Ince & Co. She deals with a wide range of contractor clients on both contentious and non-contentious issues connected with offshore operations around the world. Clare has been involved in a number of large disputes with a heavy technical content including claims concerning the design, engineering and construction of a variety of offshore units together with a series of onshore drilling and engineering issues. Clare is a member of the firm’s dry shipping business group and acts for clubs and with owners and charterers directly.

Rachel Bernie is a Solicitor at Ince & Co. She is a litigation lawyer focusing on wet and dry shipping (including maritime casualties), offshore disputes and marine and non-marine insurance matters. Rachel advises clients on matters in the English courts and London arbitrations as well as litigation internationally. She acts for ship owners, charterers, operators, P&I Clubs and their respective insurers. Although predominantly a litigator, Rachel also advises clients on non-contentious drafting issues arising from contracts, charter parties and bills of lading.

Interviewed by Helen Redding.

The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.

This article was first published on Lexis®PSL Environment on 9 April 2015.

Rachel Bernie

Rachel Bernie Managing Associate

Related sectors:

Related news & insights

Insights / Countdown to COP27: recent developments

04-11-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure, Insurance

As we get ready for COP27, we've prepared a summary some of the key developments relating to climate and environmental policies over the last few weeks.

Countdown to COP27: recent developments

News / High Court rules on interpretation of termination for convenience clause

02-11-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

Optimares S.p.A. vs. Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C 2022 WL 06175341 (2022) A termination ‘for convenience’ clause generally allows the cancellation of a contract without fault in circumstances where performance is no longer required or the terminating party finds, at its will, that the agreement should be abandoned.

High Court rules on interpretation of termination for convenience clause

News / UAE Ministerial Directive Gives the Green Light towards Allowing Enforcement of English Court Judgments onshore the UAE

21-09-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

On 13 September 2022, the UAE Ministry of Justice (MOJ) issued a landmark directive to the President of the Dubai Courts, referring to a recent English Court judgment in Lenkor Energy Trading DMCC v Puri (2020) EWHC 75 (QB) which enforced a UAE Court judgment, and urging the Dubai Courts to take requisite steps to follow the principle of reciprocity when it comes to enforcing English Court judgments in the UAE.

UAE Ministerial Directive Gives the Green Light towards Allowing Enforcement of English Court Judgments onshore the UAE

News / Climate change litigation update: Derivative claim dismissed

06-07-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

McGaughey & Anor v Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 1233 (Ch) On 24 May 2022, the High Court refused a claim brought against the directors of the Universities Superannuation Scheme (the “USS”), the largest private pension scheme in the UK, for inaction around climate change commitments.

Climate change litigation update: Derivative claim dismissed

News / Refund guarantees – avoiding drafting pitfalls

12-05-2022 / Energy & Infrastructure

Refund guarantees are often described as the cornerstones to shipbuilding projects and the buyer’s main security. Although they do not strictly form part of the shipbuilding contract, a shipbuilding project is unlikely to go ahead at all without one. It is therefore important to understand the different types of guarantee instruments, and the impact each has in practice on the guarantor’s obligations to pay and the buyer’s entitlement to recovery. A well-drafted guarantee provides certainty to the parties and strikes a balance between their respective entitlements and obligations.

Refund guarantees – avoiding drafting pitfalls