Menu
Easy Rent v EasyGroup

News / / Easy Rent v EasyGroup

In the High Court, the Judge had dismissed Easy Rent's application to stay the English proceedings under either Article 29 or Article 30 The Court of Appeal has now unanimously allowed Easy Rent's appeal and overturned that decisionArticle 29 provides that where proceedings involving the same cause of action and between the same parties arenbspcommenced in the courts of different EU member states, the court wherenbspproceedings are commenced first in time (or the court first seised) has priority and the court of anynbspother member state must stay its proceedingsnbspuntil the jurisdiction of the first court is establishednbspand, at that stage, must decline jurisdiction Article 29nbspis intended to prevent the same matters being litigatednbspbefore the courts of different member states and to avoid the risk of conflicting judgments Article 30 states that where related actions are pending before the courts of differentnbspmember states, any court other than the court first seised may stay its proceedings Actions arenbspconsidered to be related where they are so closely connected that it isnbspexpedient to hear and determine them together, thereby avoiding the risk of irreconcilable judgments that could arise out of separate proceedingsEasy Rent is a Cypriot car rental company In 2003, EasyGroup and others sued Easy Rent in Cyprus, alleging trade mark infringement and passing off In 2005, that claim was dismissed pursuant to a settlement agreement between the parties However, between 2012 and 2016, EasyGroup raised further allegations of infringement of trademarks and other intellectual property rights against Easy Rent On 24 November 2016, therefore, Easy Rent issued proceedings in Cyprus against EasyGroup and others, seeking among other things declarations that they had no liability for infringement or passing off, as well as an order for enforcement of the 2005 settlement agreement On 28 December 2016, EasyGroup issued English Court proceedings seeking relief in respect of alleged infringements of UK-registered trademarks and passing off EasyGroup also sought to have the Cypriot claim set aside and obtained an order, on 22 May 2018, setting aside that claim That order is under appeal The English Appeal Court considered whether the Cypriot Court remained seised of the proceedings in circumstances where there was an order setting aside the claim, but an appeal was pending This was a novel point on which there appeared to be no CJEU or domestic member state court authority The Court of Appeal concluded that the requirement in Article 29 for a member state court to stay its proceedings until the jurisdiction of the court first seised was established should be interpreted to include the case where the court first seised has declared that it has no jurisdiction, but an appeal is pending against that decision Therefore, the Cypriot Court remained seised of the Cypriot proceedings until the appeal against the order of 22 May 2018 was determined The Court of Appeal further found that the Cypriot and English proceedings involved the same cause of action for the purposes of Article 29 Both sets of proceedings were concerned with whether Easy Rent were infringing EasyGroup's intellectual property rights or whether EasyGroup had consented to Easy Rent's use of the trademarks In the Cypriot proceedings, Easy Rent asserted that by virtue of the settlement agreement, EasyGroup had consented to their use of the trademarks and to their carrying on their business without being liable for infringement or passing off In the English proceedings, EasyGroup sought to establish Easy Rent's liability for infringement and passing off The Court of Appeal considered that there was real potential for irreconcilable judgments in the English and Cypriot Court proceedings It concluded that Article 29 applied and the English Court had to decline jurisdictionAlthough it did not strictly need to decide the point, the Court of appeal went on to consider whether it would have exercised its discretion to grant a stay under Article 30 in favour of the Cypriot proceedings It indicated that, in all the circumstances of this case, the fact that there would be no Cypriot proceedings unless Easy Rent succeeded in their appeal in Cyprus and the fact of the very lengthy delay in any progress in the Cypriot proceedings even if the appeal was allowed, were overwhelming factors against the grant of a stay of the English proceedings Easy Rent was represented by David Gore and Sarah Townsend of Ince Gordon Dadds

Related news & insights

News / Ince advises Japanese shipowner MOL on Hong Kong's first offshore LNG terminal

02-07-2019 / Maritime, Energy & Infrastructure

2 Julynbsp2019, Singapore - Leading international law firm, Ince, has advised Japanese shipowner, Mitsui OSK Lines (MOL), on the supply of a floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) to the Hong Kong Offshore LNG terminal project (the Project)

Ince advises Japanese shipowner MOL on Hong Kong's first offshore LNG terminal

News / SPECIAL EDITION Insurance E-Brief

17-05-2019 / Insurance

We're pleased to share with you the seventh edition of The Insurance and Reinsurance Law Review

SPECIAL EDITION Insurance E-Brief

News / Ince Co and Blank Rome deliver seminar on US and EU regimes in relation to Iran and Middle East

21-03-2019 /

On Tuesday 19 March, Ince Co teamed up with the leading US sanctions experts, Blank Rome, and delivered a comprehensive sanctions seminar covering both US and EU regimes in relation to Iran and other relevant jurisdictions in the Middle East region

News / Raising capital from real estate sale and leasebacks as an alternative to debt financing

18-03-2019 / Real Estate

This article compares sale and leasebacks and debt financing from the perspective of a corporate occupier seeking to raise capital from their real estate assetsnbsp

Raising capital from real estate sale and leasebacks as an alternative to debt financing

News / Structural defects in the policy wording

26-02-2019 /

A number of buyers, largely buy-to-let investors, discovered defects in their newly-built flats shortly after the purchase They sought to recover the costs of remedying the same from three defendants, including Zurich Insurance Plc (Zurich) (trading as Zurich Building Guarantee (ZBG)) who issued building warranties as Standard 10 Year New Home Structural Defects Insurance Policies The judgment deals with the scope of the cover

News / China's Opening-up of its Insurance Sector China's Insurance Legal Framework

26-06-2018 /

Ince Co partners Fei Mao and Simon Cooper will be speaking at the International Underwriting Association of London's event on China's Opening-up of its Insurance Sector China's Insurance Legal Framework